Jaluo Dot Kom header image;

Jaluo Kama Jaluo rade gi joluo wete gi… East African, international, news, politics, culture, business & economy, environment, arts, are discussed by contributors in Africa and world wide. Writers call for social justice, better governance, quality investment.

28Feb/130

Africa: Time for a new generation of visionary leaders

From: This is Africa
To: jaluo@jaluo.com

Hello people!

Is the age of the visionary leader dead in Africa? It surely wasn't only the euphoria of independence that produced the ones we had in the 60s and 70s, so what explains the dearth of leaders as change agents, leaders with revolutionary ideals and ideas for shaping their nation, ideas beyond the prosaic stuff of road-building and foreign investment, ideas that bind people together because they give them a clear idea of where the country is heading?

One such leader was the socialist president of Mozambique, Samora Machel, who died in highly suspicious circumstances when the plane carrying him crashed in the mountain range that lies between South Africa, Mozambique and Swaziland. Was it murder? We might get an answer sometime this year. It won't answer the question of why we no longer have visionary leaders, but perhaps the news coverage will remind us all that we once had some.

Enjoy the rest of this update.

Peace.

Siji Jabbar (Editor for This is Africa)

28Feb/130

EAC defense ministers sign peace and security pact to combat terror groups

Reports Leo Odera Omolo

The East African Community Defense ministers have signed a peace and security protocol that will see the five partner states of Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi warning on peace and security threats, genocide and transnational crimes.

The move came in the background of reported increase in the activities of the Alqaeda supported Al-Shabaab terrorist group said to be slowly extending their infiltration and activities into the hitherto peaceful stable United Republic of Tanzania.

Ugandan defense Minister Dr Crispus Kiyonga who is one of the signatories said by signing the agreement, partner states will cooperate on peace and security issues as well as collaborate with the international and regional security agencies.

“EAC member states will therefore be required to develop common measures program and strategies and enter into agreement for the effective implementation of the early warning mechanism ,”The Ugandan Minister added.

A recent report by the EAC head of Anti-Narcotic and human trafficking units indicated the drug dealers have penetrated the region transnational crime is the main challenge to peace and security in the region, a threat to one country is viewed as a threat to the whole region.

Article 24 also, of the EAC Treaty, states that a threat to one country is a threat to the whole of the region.

The objective of the protocol is to promote peace, security and stability within the region, and the good neighborliness.The protocol also states that partner states will manage and seek to resolve any conflict between two or more partner states,or within foreign countries, through peaceful means in consultation with the Security council of the African Union and the UN Security council any conflict

Ends

28Feb/130

Kenya: President Obama’s controversial half-brother in Kenya in tussles with the authorities over the American and Kenyan flags which he had hoisted on top of his business premises.

From: Arrum Tidi
Writes Leo Odera Omolo

The US president Barrack Obama’s half brother in Kenya, Malik Abong’o Obama, has defiantly and flagrantly refused to lower the American and Kenyan national flags which are currently flying side by side on top of his private business premises in Siaya County.

Several attempts by government officials failed to convince Malik Obama to remove the two flags which he had hoisted on the roof of his private business. The matter has baffled many security personnel and local in the region.

A police source has hinted that the matter is being referred to the Public Prosecution department of the judiciary department for further action..

The officials and police were baffled when Obama hoisted the two flags at the entrance of his tourist class guest house which he had established in the memory of his father Barrack Obama Snr.

Malik Obama is currently embroiled I n a cut-throat election campaign battle for the Siaya County governorship. He is contesting the election as an independent candidate. Local pundits, however, maintained that Obama stand in chance of clinching the guberimental seat due to his lone ranger character.

The trouble started when the Siaya region police Chief Stephen Cheteka checked at the Guest House and ordered the two flags to be lowered on argument that the place was not a state institution. Instead he drafted a harsh letter to President Mwai Kibaki. Was loaded with numerous complaints on why a junior state officer would visit his premises unannounced and interfere with his constitutional rights.

“The step to hoist both flags show patriotism. I am very proud of both American and Kenyan national flags..I feel anyone has the right to hoist follow my footsteps,” Malik said.

observers, keen on the development of the flags dispute pitting Malik Obama and the police and members of the Provincial Administration on the other hand have been left guessing after the move compelling him to do away the two flags flying on the top of his business premises.

It was also learnt at the weekend that Malik Obama recently sacked the entire staff at his Obama Guest House four months ago.

Ends

28Feb/130

Kenya: Villagers retrieved the half-consumed body of a girl killed by crocodile near Kisumu

Reports Leo Odera Omolo

RESCUERS and search team have retrieved the half consumed body of a 17 year old girl who was killed by a Nile Crocodile as she went to the lakeside to fetch for waters.

Anne Auma was killed early last week, but her half eaten body was recovered last Saturday inside the reed plantation.

The search team was joined by the staff of the KWS. Residents have since appealed to the KWS and the government to hunt down the killer reptile and ensure that the villagers were safe from such attacks in future.

Report reaching us says that there are upsurge of incidents of crocodile attacks in various parts of Lake Victoria. An incident was recently reported around Kokwiri in Uyoma West .Rarieda district where a fisherman was devoured by a crocodile.

Another incident occurred on Rusinga Island in Mbita district. There are numerous incidents involving crocodile attacking and killing domesticated animals such as sheep and goats.

IN uriri district in Migori County a 12 year old school girl who had gone to the River Oyani with her mother on clothes washing mission was attacked and killed by a crocodile.The animal population had declined after the massive hunting down and killing hundreds for their valuable skins in the early 1950s. However, the colonial government reintroduced the reptiles back into the lake in early 1960.

The menace of crocodile attacking human being and animals in Lake Victoria has risen..

Crocodiles feeds on fish, but in the absence of sufficient number of fish in the lake for its feeding it can resort to hunting down human beings and domestic animals for prey..

Ends

28Feb/130

WHAT VATICAN SAYS ABOUT POPE’S EXIT

From: Ouko joachim omolo
The News Dispatch with Omolo Beste in images
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2013

The Vatican has said that the moment the pope's powers officially expire at 1900 GMT, the ex-pontiff will officially be known by the new title of "Roman Pontiff Emeritus" although he will still be addressed as "Your Holiness".

He will also keep his papal name of "Benedict XVI" and will not be referred by his original name as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in more firsts for the Vatican, where the traditional system is geared towards popes dying in office.

At exactly 8 p.m. Thursday, the Swiss Guards who protect him will leave their posts and return to Rome in a symbolic act to signify that the papal chair is empty. This morning, Benedict will hold an audience with all the cardinals in Rome, including those who have traveled to mark his last public audience, and including many of the cardinal electors who will choose his replacement.

That will be his last opportunity before the conclave to express his wishes for the future of the church, and it would be a prime opportunity to tell his princes to clean up the so-called house of God.

Around 5 p.m. Thursday, Benedict will leave Vatican City for the last time as pope. He will be flown by helicopter to the pontifical summer residence in Castel Gandolfo in the Roman foothills, where he will stay until the restoration work on the Vatican City monastery where he will live is complete.

While Cardinal Keith O’Brien has rescued himself from conclave, Cardinal Roger Mahony intends to help select a new pope in Rome despite calls from some critics that he withdraws from the process in the wake of revelations about his actions in the priest sex-abuse scandal.

The day Pope Benedict XVI announced his resignation almost two weeks ago, Mahony wrote on his blog that he looked forward to participating in the conclave of cardinals in Rome to elect Benedict's successor.

That stance elicited some criticism given that last month the Los Angeles Archdiocese stripped Mahony, its former archbishop, of his public duties after it was revealed that he plotted to conceal child molestation by priests.

But Mahony indicated via Twitter on Friday that he still would be part of the sequestered papal selection process. On Saturday, a group called Catholics United delivered a petition with nearly 10,000 signatures asking that Mahony not participate in the conclave because of the abuse scandals that happened under his watch, said Chris Pumpelly, spokesman for Catholics United.

Undoubtedly, his presence in Rome will anger and disappoint many who feel he should not be performing duties there. Mahony has already been told not to perform public duties in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. However, he "remains a priest in good standing" according to the Archdiocese and he is fully permitted to participate in the papal conclave.

According to the list of cardinals to elect the new pope, the name of Cardinal O’Brien is still on even though he withdrew himself from participating. Conclave kicks off on March 4, third Sunday of Lent.

Here is a list of cardinal-electors, from oldest to youngest, eligible to vote for a pope in a conclave. Cardinals who are under age 80 when the "sede vacante" begins Feb. 28, 2013, are eligible to vote. There will be 117 cardinal-electors on that date.

1. Severino Poletto of Turin, Italy

2. Juan Sandoval Iniguez of Guadalajara, Mexico.

3. Godfried Danneels of Mechelen-Brussels.

4. Francisco Javier Errazuriz Ossa of Santiago de Chile.

5. Raffaele Farina, retired head of the Vatican Secret Archives and the Vatican Library.

6. Geraldo Majella Agnelo of Sao Salvador da Bahia, Brazil.

7. Joachim Meisner of Cologne, Germany.

8. Raul Vela Chiriboga of Quito, Ecuador.

9. Giovanni Battista Re, former prefect of the Congregation for Bishops.

10. Dionigi Tettamanzi of Milan.

11. Francesco Monterisi, retired secretary of the Congregation for Bishops.

12. Claudio Hummes, retired prefect of the Congregation for Clergy.

13. Carlos Amigo Vallejo of Seville, Spain.

14. Paolo Sardi, a former official in the Vatican Secretariat of State.

15. Paul Josef Cordes, past president of Cor Unum.

16. Franc Rode, retired prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life.

17. Tarcisio Bertone, secretary of state.

18. Julius Darmaatmadja, Jakarta, Indonesia.

19. Jean-Baptiste Pham Minh Man, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

20. Giovanni Lajolo, former president of the commission governing Vatican City State.

21. Antonios Naguib, Alexandria, Egypt.

22. Justin Rigali of Philadelphia.

23. Velasio De Paolis, papal delegate overseeing reform of the Legionaries of Christ and Regnum Christi.

24. Santos Abril Castello, archpriest of Basilica of St. Mary Major.

25. Jose da Cruz Policarpo, Lisbon, Portugal.

26. Roger Mahony, retired archbishop of Los Angeles.

27. Julio Terrazas Sandoval of Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.

28. Ivan Dias, former prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples.

29. Karl Lehmann of Mainz, Germany.

30. William Joseph Levada, retired prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

31. Anthony Olubunmi Okogie of Lagos, Nigeria.

32. Jean-Claude Turcotte of Montreal.

33. Antonio Maria Rouco Varela of Madrid.

34. Jaime Ortega Alamino of Havana.

35. Nicolas Lopez Rodriguez of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

36. Ennio Antonelli of Florence, Italy.

37. Theodore-Adrien Sarr of Dakar, Senegal.

38. Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

39. Francis George of Chicago.

40. Audrys Juozas Backis Vilnius, Lithuania.

41. Raymundo Damasceno Assis of Aparecida, Brazil.

42. Attilio Nicora, president emeritus of the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See.

43. Lluis Martinez Sistach of Barcelona, Spain.

44. Antonio Maria Veglio, president of the Pontifical Council for Migrants and Travelers.

45. Paolo Romeo of Palermo, Italy.

46. Francesco Coccopalmerio, president of the Pontifical Council for Interpreting Legislative Texts.

47. Keith O'Brien of St. Andrews and Edinburgh, Scotland.???

48. Manuel Monteiro de Castro, head of the Apostolic Penitentiary.

49. Carlo Caffarra, of Bologna, Italy.

50. Angelo Amato, prefect of the Congregation for Saints' Causes.

51. Edwin F. O'Brien, grand master of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre.

52. Stanislaw Dziwisz of Krakow, Poland.

53. John Tong Hon of Hong Kong.

54. Sean Brady of Armagh, Northern Ireland.

55. Laurent Monsengwo Pasinya of Kinshasa, Congo.

56. Zenon Grocholewski, prefect of the Congregation for Catholic Education.

57. Telesphore Toppo, of Ranchi, India.

58. Bechara Rai, Maronite patriarch.

59. Agostino Vallini, papal vicar for Rome.

60. Donald W. Wuerl of Washington.

61. Gabriel Zubeir Wako of Khartoum, Sudan.

62. Wilfrid F. Napier of Durban, South Africa.

63. George Pell of Sydney.

64. Angelo Scola of Milan.

65. Norberto Rivera Carrera of Mexico City.

66. Jorge Urosa Savino of Caracas, Venezuela.

67. Ruben Salazar Gomez of Bogota, Colombia.

68. Giuseppe Bertello, president of the Governorate of Vatican City State.

69. Gianfranco Ravasi, president of the Pontifical Council for Culture.

70. Andre Vingt-Trois of Paris.

71. Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga of Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

72. Angelo Bagnasco of Genoa, Italy.

73. Domenico Calcagno, president of the Administration of the Patrimony of the Holy See.

74. Jean-Louis Tauran, president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue.

75. George Alencherry of Ernakulam-Angamaly, major archbishop of Syro-Malabar Catholic Church.

76. Dominik Duka of Prague, Czech Republic.

77. Crescenzio Sepe of Naples, Italy.

78. Giuseppe Versaldi, president of the Prefecture for the Economic Affairs of the Holy See.

79. Angelo Comastri, archpriest of St. Peter's Basilica.

80. Leonardo Sandri, prefect of the Congregation for Eastern Churches.

81. Juan Cipriani Thorne of Lima, Peru.

82. John Olorunfemi Onaiyekan of Abuja, Nigeria.

83. Marc Ouellet, prefect of the Congregation for Bishops.

84. Sean Patrick O'Malley of Boston.

85. Polycarp Pengo of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

86. Mauro Piacenza, prefect of the Congregation for Clergy.

87. Jean-Pierre Ricard of Bordeaux, France.

88. Oswald Gracias of Mumbai, India.

89. John Njue of Nairobi, Kenya.

90. Christoph Schonborn of Vienna.

91. Robert Sarah, president of the Pontifical Council Cor Unum.

92. Stanislaw Rylko, president of the Pontifical Council for the Laity.

93. Vinko Puljic of Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina.

94. Antonio Canizares Llovera, prefect of the Vatican Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments.

95. Fernando Filoni, prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples.

96. Thomas C. Collins of Toronto.

97. Giuseppe Betori of Florence, Italy.

98. Joao Braz de Aviz, prefect of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life.

99. Albert Malcom Ranjith of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

100. Raymond L. Burke, prefect of the Supreme Court of the Apostolic Signature.

101. Peter Turkson, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace.

102. Francisco Robles Ortega of Guadalajara, Mexico.

103. Josip Bozanic of Zagreb, Croatia.

104. Daniel N. DiNardo of Galveston-Houston.

105 Odilo Pedro Scherer of Sao Paulo.

106. James M. Harvey, archpriest of the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls.

107. Kazimierz Nycz of Warsaw, Poland.

108. Timothy M. Dolan of New York.

109. Kurt Koch, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity.

110. Philippe Barbarin of Lyon, France.

111. Peter Erdo of Esztergom-Budapest, Hungary.

112. Willem Jacobus Eijk of Utrecht, Netherlands.

113. Reinhard Marx of Munich and Freising, Germany.

114. Rainer Maria Woelki of Berlin.

115. Luis Antonio Tagle of Manila, Philippines.

116. Baselios Cleemis Thottunkal, major archbishop of the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church.

117. Walter Kasper, president emeritus of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity.

Fr Joachim Omolo Ouko, AJ
Tel +254 7350 14559/+254 722 623 578
E-mail omolo.ouko@gmail.com
Facebook-omolo beste
Twitter-@8000accomole

Real change must come from ordinary people who refuse to be taken hostage by the weapons of politicians in the face of inequality, racism and oppression, but march together towards a clear and unambiguous goal.

-Anne Montgomery, RSCJ UN Disarmament Conference, 2002

27Feb/130

USA Bureau of African Affairs Diplomacy Engagement

From: Judy Miriga

Folks,

“Kenya Decision 2013: The Kenyan Diaspora and the March Elections”

First, I want to register my heartfelt thanks to the US Department of State, Bureau of African Affairs Ms. Nicole Peacock in Partnership with The Africa Society of the National Summit on Africa Ms. Bernadette; who put together logistics and invited us to attend an indulging, resourceful and open collaborative diplomacy exchange where we learned more about what the U.S. Government is doing to support peaceful, credible, free and fair elections in Kenya and also gave the Diaspora members opportunity to share their thoughts on the upcoming elections.

I was truly grateful for the introduction from Steve Walker, Director of the Office of East African Affairs who was kind enough to set stage for a more conducive, friendly and cordial atmosphere for the engagement. We appreciated recognition in attendance of Lucy with colleague Representatives from Embassy of Kenya, with the introduction of Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, Donald Teitelbaum who gave us a broader perspective of what USA in Partnership with Kenya Government is doing on the ground to help Kenya gain a Peaceful, credible, free and fair elections.

Among those in attendance, there were notably USAID official Representatives, the Co-founder of Pan African Entrepreneurs (PAEC), Mr. Harry C. Alford with a good number of Kenyan Diasporas, the NGOs, activists and Media Representatives.

I had serious concerns that the elections are coming close with a few days to go while:

Ø the situation of electoral process and procedures for Integrity for candidates examination for background checks and balances flawed and was not in compliance resulting in the irregularity of awarding certificates to favor some contestants against the will of voters

Ø the buying of voter IDs to rig election is going on in very high scale all over the country and it is a way to take advantage of poverty stricken people with millions of helpless and desperate Internally displaced persons. These group of people have not been provided with any Civic Education to prepare them and make them aware of their value added voting rights potentials, sensitizing them about the Reform Accord Agreement for the New Constitution with prospects of development resources available for respective Community engagement to spur progressive projects in their respective County’s Development Programs

Ø the unresolved explosive of land grabbing with constant insecurities including continued unfair forced evictions of the local communities from their ancestral land are rendering people hopelessly homeless in area such like Nyanza, Turkana, Garissa, Isiolo, Rift Valley, Mombasa, Taita Tavetta, Kwale, Tana River, Lamu has created a very worrisome situation

Ø Voter Education is lacking and many people do not understand what they are about to get into. The Voter Education as was done during the Referendum was very successful and there is need of the same to be applied so people understand what County Devolution Governance entails, how it works with what is expected from Governors in order to commit responsibility with integrity to render collective and consultative public service in a balanced transparent manner to the County’s Communities efficiently and effective according to mandate.

Ø Presently as is on the ground, there are serious loopholes of insecurities and from irregularities which are providing fodder for corruption and rigging that have not been rectified and is providing worrisome fears.

Ø failing to provide an Independent Transitional team headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court according to the Reform Accord Agreement of the New Constitution the present Team under Mr. Kimemia is not in compliance where Kimemia is seen to have awarded himself powers of appointing and managing the Transitional caretaker with members of his Kikuyu tribe from top police and intelligence avoiding inclusion of other 43 Tribal group. This shall not factor fairness of representation as is required in the Devolution Reform Accord Agreement

Ø Failing to Reform the Police which was top requirement for Reform and was the reason for 2007/8 Extrajudicial killings the matter was shelved until after election, so to be fixed by the next government and this is completely wrong as it is unacceptable. There are fears that this behavior has cultivated for mixed reactions as presently, there are looming insecurities and threats that are building up with the recent death threat and travelling denial by the Permanent Secretary Mr. Kimemia put on Chief Justice Willy Mutunga forcing him to make public statement fearing for his life and to stop him from travelling on official duty. Coupled with all the mushrooming insecurities in the Country, the environment in the country is fluid and has developed ripples of fears that a repeat of 2007/8 is very evident in the minds of many.

Additionally, in a new development, IEBC to simply object a suit filed by Aluochier questioning integrity of qualifications of candidates at the Supreme Courts is stepping overboard and is considered frustrating Chief Justice from executing fair justice to the public. It is unethically wrong and unconstitutional.

It is Aluochier’s constitutional right to be heard before elections can proceed. IEBC does not have autonomy according to Reform Accord Agreement for the New Constitution to assume powers and control over matters filed at the Supreme Courts. As a matter of concern, IEBC is shrouded with lots of constitutional flaws and irregularities that to allow March 4th 2013 election to go on will be suicidal except to consider suspending it for a few more moths to correct the anomalies.

The above concerns informed my justified opinion to request for an appeal that we do the right thing the first time; that we correct the anomalies and fix flaws with other irregularities staged for rigging the election so we make history and be a show-case to other African Nations.

As I understand and know the people of Kenya over the years,, they are peaceful and very loving, it is therefore considered fair to give all Kenyans irrespectively a reliable Democratic space free from rigging, intimidation and fear-factor so they have an opportunity to excercise their true democratic rights like they did during the Referendum to participate in the first Reform Change election in an environment which is free from terrorism but which is peaceful, credible, free and fair. As things stand, this is not the case. The elections of March 4th 2013 under the above worrisome conditions is seen to fashion a stage-managed election to favor a certain tribal group against the 43 tribes of Kenya, for which case, it shall remain flawed, Null and Void as the process is flawed and is not in compliance with Reform Accord Agreement of the New Constitution.

The coming election is very crucial for Kenya people, partners, friends and sympathizers that it should be done the right way the first time and therefore, the election of March 4th be deferred but if we provide a little more time for fixing the irregularities, we are able to provide the Civic Education which is lacking, include the Diasporas to participate in the electioneering to vote and correct the flaws and irregularities before the date of next election can be seen to be peaceful, credible, free and fair.

It is critical that my request be urgently considered so at the end of it all, we shall be happy under peace caring and sharing for common good of all, and who ever wins, we shall join in the celebration to congratulate the winner and joining to repair past differences amicably without any animosity.

Judy Miriga
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA

http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com

and Special Coordinator Representative for Pan Africa
World African Diaspora Union (WADU)
in Maryland, Virginia and DC

- - - - - - - - - - -

IEBC opposes suit against candidates
Updated Wednesday, February 27 2013 at 00:00 GMT+3

By WAHOME THUKU

Kenya: The national electoral agency has lodged an objection to a suit seeking to block top presidential contenders and their running mates from being on the ballot in next week’s polls.

The Independent, Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) wants the case filed by a voter at the Supreme Court dismissed, arguing it cannot be determined by that court.

The petition, set to be heard today, has been filed by Mr Isaac Aluochier and is challenging the qualification of Raila Odinga, Uhuru Kenyatta, Musalia Mudavadi, Peter Kenneth and two running mates, Kalonzo Musyoka and William Ruto, to gun for the top seats.

Mr Aluochier contends the top presidential candidates should not have been nominated to vie for the seats as they were constitutionally unqualified. The voter in Migori argues that Raila, Uhuru, Mudavadi and Kenneth were already State officers when nominated by their respective parties and should not have been cleared by IEBC.

“While the Constitution allows a sitting President and his/her deputy to run for the two seats, it does not allow the PM, DPM and ministers,” he said. He said the four cannot argue they were MPs because on their nominations, Parliament’s term had already expired.

IEBC says 31,000 missing from voters’ list
Updated Wednesday, February 27 2013 at 00:00 GMT+3

By ROSELYNE OBALA

Nairobi; Kenya: About 31,000 voters are missing from the Biometric Voter Registration (BVR) system, the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) has disclosed.

Part of this number is that of those who registered more than once. However, the electoral body has assured the public that there is no cause for alarm. IEBC Voter Registration Director Immaculate Kassait said those affected would be allowed to vote if their details are in the manual register. “It does not mean these voters will not participate in the elections. We are going to use the manual register to check their details,” she explained.

Ms Kassait continued: “If their names are in the register and they did not registere twice, they will vote.”

She said some of the affected voters registered multiple times.

She spoke at Nairobi’s Bomas of Kenya, where the commission has set up the National Elections Centre, after a meeting with political parties liaison committee and Registrar of Political Parties Lucy Ndung’u in last-minute preparations for the Monday polls.

Party representatives had an opportunity to be taken through the final arrangements. The area is cordoned off and only accredited persons are allowed access.

Kimemia faces contempt charges over tender row
Updated Friday, February 22 2013 at 00:00 GMT+3

By Lucianne Limo

KENYA: A Chinese company that won a multi-billion shilling security tender that was later cancelled by Head of Public Service Francis Kimemia wants to institute contempt of court and defamation charges against him.

ZTE Corporation through their lawyer Donald Kipkorir said it is aggrieved by Kimemia’s letter asking Ministry of Internal Security to cancel the tender.

“We have firm instructions to demand, which we hereby do, your immediate withdrawal of your said letter and in any event before the end of today, in default, whereof our instructions are to institute criminal and civil contempt proceedings against you,” reads part of the letter to Kimemia.

The company wants the Head of Civil Service held in contempt on grounds that he has interfered with the matter yet the court had issued stay orders on the tender pending the hearing and determination of a case filed by a firm that lost the contract.

On Monday, Kimemia cancelled the tender and ordered the contract be re-advertised, saying costs ballooned and serious allegations of irregularity were made with regard to the tender

High Court Judge George Odunga ordered the Minister for Internal Security not to award the contract to any party pending the determination of the case filed by Huawei Technologies Company. The court issued the interim orders after Huawei, which bid for the tender alongside five other companies, challenged a decision by Public Procurement Administrative Review Board dismissing its appeal for review of the tendering process.

Repeat process

The board dismissed Huawei’s appeal and directed the Ministry of Internal Security to go ahead and award the contract to the successful bidder, ZTE Corporation.

Huawei filed an appeal before the procurement board complaining that the Ministry of Internal Security had a flawed tender process, but its case to have a repeat of the process was dismissed prompting it to move to the High Court.

ZTE Corporation says Kimemia has defamed them by alleging that they exaggerated the cost of project in excess of Sh1.8 billion up from initial estimated costs of Sh7 billion.

ZTE also says Kimemia’s assertion that they influenced the evaluation process and offered kickbacks to some officials to influence preferred outcome amounts to libel.

27Feb/130

Kenya: CHF International and Partners doing great

From: odhiambo okecth

Dear Friends,

The CHF International, PeaceNet Kenya and Kituo Cha Sheria today invited a team of CSOs from Mathare, Kiambio, Kibera and Korokocho for last minute preparations for the General Elections in a series of meetings and trainings at the CHF International offices in Nairobi.

The first Team was that of Election Observers and they were taken through the Code of Conduct and Instructions on what their role will be come the 4th March 2013. We were ably taken through this by Gilbert from PeaceNet Kenya, Susan from Kituo Cha Sheria under the watchful presence of John of CHF International. Ms Selline Korir- the Director CHF International Kenya Tuna Uwezo was at hand to give the last remarks during the morning session.

I was invited to observe and share my thoughts with the CSO Leaders.

I was impressed with the state of preparedness from the Team and further, it was refreshing to hear that the TNA Candidate for Parliament in Mathare Constituency Mr. GM Wanjohi and the ODM Candidate for Parliament in Mathare Constituency Mr. Steve Kariuki and their campaign Teams met in Mathare Area 3C the other day at 6.00pm and they came down from their caravans, greeted each other and hugged.

That was a sure sign of maturity and it went a long way to calm the nerves of the residents of Mathare 3C. How I wished there was a Camera around to capture this great moment from our politicians.

Nairobi 2013

As we engage in last minute Peace Building efforts, we are inviting Kenyans to remain firm. This is our Country and we can either make or break her. We must learn from the TNA and ODM Leaders in Mathare that this is only a contest and not a conflict.

We at The Clean Kenya Campaign and all our Partners who have been with us in the trenches and in the front line at Peace Building know the mood of Kenyans. Kenyans want a Clean and Peaceful General Elections.

We are all going to do our part as Kenyans and we are now calling on the IEBC to also stand tall and be counted. The last General Election was botched by sloppy and inept handling from the defunct Electoral Commission of Kenya. This led to the team being disbanded in a most dis-graceful manner and they have for ever lived in shame.

The current Team led by the ever green Isaack Hassan and Maj James Oswago, must lift the spirit of Kenyans up. The lives and property of Kenyans lie on how you are going to handle the Elections of 4th March 2013. You may choose to stand tall and be counted as great Kenyans, or, you may fiddle and end up the way the defunct outfit went.

The die is cast and Kenya and the World is watching you.

Let us all work for a Clean Kenya, a Clean Africa and a Clean General Election as a Transformative Deliverable as we turn 50 in Kenya.

Odhiambo T Oketch,
Executive Director,

The Clean Kenya Campaign- TCKC

Tel; 0724 365 557

Email; komarockswatch@yahoo. com
Blogspot; http:// kcdnkomarockswatch. blogspot.com
Website; www.kcdnkenya.org
Facebook;University Students for a Clean Kenya

Facebook; Odhiambo T Oketch
Facebook; Monthly Nationwide Clean up Campaign
Mailing Group; friendsofkcdn@ yahoogroups.com

The Clean Kenya Campaign is an Initiative of KCDN Kenya

27Feb/130

KENYA: KISUMU COURT GIVES MUHORONI ASPIRANT GO AHEAD TO THE BALLOT.

By Agwanda Saye

THE High court in Kisumu yesterday gave Muhoroni PDP parliamentary aspirant James Onyango K ‘Oyoo the nod to vie for the seat after dismissing a petition lodged by a voter seeking to stop his candidature.
The petition which was filed by a voter was seeking to stop K’Oyoo from contesting for the seat on grounds that he flouted IEBC rules by defecting to a party after the expiry of the party hopping Period.

Justice Hilary Chemitei dismissed the petition lodged by Mr. Peter Oyuko against Mr K’Oyoo who defected from ODM to PDP after being denied the ticket in his former party.

In his petition Oyuko contended that Mr K’Oyoo defected from ODM to PDP after the grace period which was given by the registrar of political parties.

The petitioner wanted Mr K’Oyoo’s name not to be included in the IEBC ballot papers for the forthcoming general elections.

He also wanted the court to declare that K’Oyoo is still a bona fide member of the ODM and therefore bar him from contesting the seat on a PDP ticket.

K’Oyoo’s lawyer Onyango Jamsumba argued that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the petition and instead the petition should have exhaust all the dispute resolution mechanisms before moving to court.

In his ruling the judge observed that the ODM elections shad been shambolic and said that K’Oyoo has a right to participate in the general elections.

Justice Chemitei further found out that the petitioner’s right had not been infringed as he could not explain the right in question.

The petition the judge ruled had no locus standi in filing the petition before court.

The petitioner is a primary school teacher at Sanda primary school in Muhoroni and was represented by a Kisumu Mr Stephen Aluoch K’Opot.

Ends.

27Feb/130

THIRD SUNDAY OF LENT COINCIDES WITH GENERAL ELECTIONS IN KENYA

From: Ouko joachim omolo
The News Dispatch with Omolo Beste in images
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2013

March 3 will be the eve of general elections in Kenya, the third Sunday of Lent. The Kenya Episcopal Conference, Justice and Peace Commission in their Lenten campaign chose “county governance” as their specific theme.

There are 47 counties in Kenya representing the initially recognized districts and each one of them forms a county government. Every county government shall further decentralize its services and coordinate its functions in order to efficiently serve the interests of the people of Kenya at the local levels.

Better known as majimbo in Kiswahili, commonly used to refer to political devolution of power to the country’s regions, its entrenchment into the new constitution was heavily opposed by some section of religious leaders and politicians who had their own interest.

Like some religious leaders who were opposed to devolve government system in Kenya, retired President Daniel Moi spoke strongly against introduction of majimbo, saying it would divide Kenyans along tribal lines, warning he would campaign against the Proposed Constitution if it includes majimbo.

While some religious leaders backed Moi’s views, saying majimbo is likely to spark tribal animosity, in Coast Province, leaders threatened to shoot down the Proposed Constitution if it failed to provide for majimbo.

The Coast people like other marginalized ethnic communities rooted for majimbo to ensure that residents benefit from enormous resources in the region, arguing it would ensure equity and encourage economic productivity.

Historically, the coastals have been fervent proponents of majimbo, spearheaded by Ronald Gideon Ngala, Kenyan politician whose life was marked by a realistic approach to politics and by a devotion to Kenya which allowed him to place his country's stability and growth first over his own political ambition.

Ngala co-founded Kenya African Democratic Union (KADU) in 1960 when several leading politicians from marginalized communities refused to join Jomo Kenyatta’s African National Union (KANU).

KADU's aim was to defend the interests of the so-called KAMATUSA (an acronym for Kelenjin, Maasai, Turkana and Samburu ethnic groups), against the dominance of the larger Luo and Kikuyu that comprised the majority of KANU's membership.

Even though religious leaders and churches opposed to devolved government described the system of governance as "disastrous", arguing that Kenya was not ready for devolve government, up to almost 95 percent Christians and other religious affiliates opted for the new constitution and entrenchment of devolve government system as opposed to their religious leaders. This was because of their bad experience with the old one.

Kenyans had suffered great deal under all regimes since independent that is why the vast majority of Christians and other religious affiliates opted to oppose their leaders this time along. They pushed for devolve government because they wanted resources closer to all Kenyans, especially the marginalized groups.

They believed that a well thought out devolution system will ensure that they will have a better access to resources as opposed to a purely centralized system which they believe will concentrate resources in Nairobi.

They also perceive that devolution will help to reserve all jobs, resources, businesses etc for the people indigenous to that particular region. To the best of the understanding, after their version of devolution also known as Majimbo is introduced, all the people who have residences, businesses, properties, jobs etc in these regions will be required to surrender the same to those indigenous to that area.

Yet there are those who argue that majimboism had been tried in 1963, it failed, and must be forgotten. It failed because the 1963 majimbo experiment was a hastily conceived, clumsily crafted and badly presented variant of federalism.

Partly because the powerful presidency of the time (as it is today) was never enthusiastic about the idea, it is why Kanu government was reluctant to adopt the system.

Majimboism is about letting Kenyans take ownership and full responsibility for the economic development of their regions by managing the planning and day-to-day management of their affairs. Majimboism is about taking the CDF concept further and truly localizing the local authorities.

The North Eastern Province, for example, may soon turn out to be the richest region in Kenya when drilling for oil and gas starts. The Coast Province is endowed with a lot of wealth and has the port facilities to generate revenue. The Central Province is already well ahead of other regions in development.

Most of Rift Valley is endowed with good agricultural land and can easily take care of the development of drier parts of the Province. The same goes for Western and Nyanza provinces. Most of these two provinces have very good agricultural land and the fishing industry can become a major income earner in the two provinces.

In addition, most parts of Eastern Province have good agricultural land whose potential can be fully tapped if irrigation is widely used. Understood in this way, Majimboism is about cutting wastes and eliminating corruption by reducing the number of pest-like middlemen.

With Majimboism for example, it will mean that there will no longer be KTDA but local Tea authorities. For example, there will be Rift Valley Tea Development Authority which will be responsible for managing the growing, processing, and export of Tea that is grown in Rift Valley within Rift Valley.

In Nyanza, there will be Nyanza Tea Development Authority which will be responsible for managing the Tea affairs within Nyanza. The same goes for Western, Eastern, and Central Provinces.

The first reading for third Sunday of Lent is taken from the book of Exodus, 3:1-8, 13-15. The reading portrays Moses as a good shepherd who is committed to tending the flock of his father-in-law Jethro, the priest of Midian.

As he led the flock across the desert, he came to Horeb, the mountain of God where an angel of the LORD appeared to him in fire flaming out of a bush. As he looked on, he was surprised to see that the bush, though on fire, was not consumed.

When Moses decided to go over to look at this remarkable sight, and see why the bush is not burned,” God called out to him from the bush, told him to remove the sandals from his feet, for the place where he was standing was holy ground.

God told him “I have witnessed the affliction of my people in Egypt and have heard their cry of complaint against their slave drivers, so I know well what they are suffering. Therefore I have come down to rescue them from the hands of the Egyptians and lead them out of that land into a good and spacious land, a land flowing with milk and honey.”

Moses said to God, “But when I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ if they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ what am I to tell them?”

God replied, “I am who I am.” Then he added, “This is what you shall tell the Israelites: I AM sent to you.”

God spoke further to Moses, “Thus shall you say to the Israelites: The LORD, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, the God of Jacob, has sent me to you. “This is my name forever; thus am I to be remembered through all generations.”

Responsorial Psalm Ps 103: 1-2, 3-4, 6-7, 8, 11 says how God is merciful, God who forgives all our iniquities, heals all our ills, and redeems our life from destruction, crowns us with kindness and compassion. He secures justice and the rights of all the oppressed.

The second reading is taken from 1 Cor 10:1-6, 10-12 - Even though all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink, for they drank from a spiritual rock that followed them, the rock was the Christ, yet God was not pleased with most of them, for they were struck down in the desert.

These things happened as examples for us, so that we might not desire evil things, as they did. Do not grumble as some of them did, and suffered death by the destroyer.

These things happened to them as an example, and they have been written down as a warning to us, upon whom the end of the ages has come. Therefore, whoever thinks he is standing secure should take care not to fall.

Gospel is taken from Lk 13:1-9 –It talks of some people who told Jesus about the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with the blood of their sacrifices. Jesus wants people to repent: “But I tell you, if you do not repent you will all perish as they did!”

And he told them this parable: “There once was a person who had a fig tree planted in his orchard, and when he came in search of fruit on it but found none, he said to the gardener, ‘For three years now I have come in search of fruit on this fig tree but have found none. So cut it down.

Why should it exhaust the soil?’ He said to him in reply, ‘Sir, leave it for this year also, and I shall cultivate the ground around it and fertilize it; it may bear fruit in the future. If not you can cut it down.’”

Fr Joachim Omolo Ouko, AJ
Tel +254 7350 14559/+254 722 623 578
E-mail omolo.ouko@gmail.com
Facebook-omolo beste
Twitter-@8000accomole

Real change must come from ordinary people who refuse to be taken hostage by the weapons of politicians in the face of inequality, racism and oppression, but march together towards a clear and unambiguous goal.

-Anne Montgomery, RSCJ UN Disarmament Conference, 2002

27Feb/130

Kenya: Chief Justice Played Into “Mungiki Letter”?

From: Mary Gakere

From: Joe Kihara Munugu

Chief Justice Played Into "Mungiki Letter"?
By Lance Kipng'etich : Nation Media : February 23 2013

http://elections.nation.co.ke/Blogs/-/1632026/1702608/-/11884gn/-/index.html

Kenya's Chief Justice, Dr. Willy Mutunga, is a well-read man, so he must know about the infamous “Zinoviev letter”. The authors of a letter purporting to be from a group called the Mungiki Veterans’ Association borrowed heavily from the Zinoviev letter, one of the best known forgery-letters in history. This notorious Zinoviev letter was published in the British press four days before Britain's general election of 1924. It was allegedly sent by the Communist Party in Moscow to the Communist Party of Great Britain. The letter, which was later revealed to be a forgery written by an M16 intelligence agent, appeared to be a directive from Moscow calling for intensified communist agitation in Britain.

It was an effort to show voters that the Labour party was working for the Soviet Union and, therefore, influence the electorate against them.The plot failed as it did not affect the Labour vote. However, it helped the Conservative Party hasten the collapse of the liberal party and contributed to the landslide victory for the Conservatives.

The letter took its name from a senior Soviet official, Grigory Zinoviev, its purported author.Many Kenyans were shocked and saddened to see Dr Mutunga similarly insert himself into the political scene with his own version of a clearly forged letter designed to influence an election.The reaction was one of immense sadness at seeing a respected figure like Dr Mutunga offering a serious proposition that the letter was written in defence of Deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta and his presidential running mate in the Jubilee Coalition, William Ruto.

Whoever authored this document was defending no known interests of Uhuru, Ruto or the coalition they head and that has endeared itself to the hearts and minds of millions of Kenyans.

Uhuru and Ruto remain the real targets of the screaming forgery.
I hold no brief for the Mungiki, Kenyatta, Ruto or Jubilee. However, none of them are so boneheaded as to author the explicitly forged document that the CJ presented to the press with a straight face at the Supreme Court of Kenya at lunchtime on Wednesday, February 20.

Why did Kenya’s top jurist participate in such a cheap ploy?
The concluding remarks of the CJ’s statement accompanying the tabling of the pathetic forgery are instructive: “I appeal to Kenyans to hold a peaceful election. It is only by so doing that we shall silence these dark forces of retrogression and also advance our constitutional and democratic promise. My fellow Kenyans, with confidence and tribute to the nation, go and vote for our Constitution. It is the only way to reject those who threaten and proclaim violence as a false choice”.

Coming from the person designated the President of the Supreme Court of Kenya, these apparently pious words mask an unacceptably politically partisan and activist posture. They are a coded message calling for the defeat of the Jubilee Coalition by the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (Cord).

Divisive manner
The head of the Supreme Court of Kenya has no business intervening in politics in such a divisive manner so close to the General Election.
He should remain far above the fray, evincing no support whatever for any side and no preference. He presumably holds one vote and will cast it as he deems appropriate come March 4 under conditions of the secret ballot.

Above all, the CJ must never be seen to be a participant in a political ruse full of propaganda and trickery.Whether the CJ was a witting or unwitting participant in the scornful tactic and strategy rolled out on Wednesday, whether he was a prime mover or a total dupe, is besides the point.

He, of all people, should not have rushed to judgment. He ought not to have treated the Jubilee Coalition with the contemptuous, distrustful manner that he demonstrated.
Sadly, the effect of the letter is that I, for one, will never look at the Supreme Court of Kenya, and Dr Mutunga’s leadership of it, with the same eyes again. Nor will millions of Kenyans who comprise the silent majority.

Although Uhuru and Ruto are the real targets of the miserable third-hand forgery, they will not fall victim to it.

---------
The writer, Lance Kipng'etich, is a book publisher in Nakuru, Kenya

26Feb/130

Collaboration among African countries is A must in jobs infrastructures development and economic growth

From: Abdalah Hamis
From: Abdalah Hamis

Collaboration among African countries a must in the development of foundation infrastructures for jobs and economic growth on the Continent.

Author: Dr. Antipas Massawe/massaweantipas@hotmail.com

Despite of the huge revenues governments on the African continent are earning from the ongoing development and exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources like metals, coal, uranium, diamonds, gemstones other than diamonds, oil, natural gas and industrial minerals, economic growth is still very slow and joblessness escalating on the continent. The individual going African governments are on in the development of their economic growth potentials does not allow mobilizing enough from the revenues individuals are earning from the ongoing development and exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources within their jurisdictions for investing as the seed capital required to enable optimal development of the foundation economic infrastructures enabling stimulation of investments for economic growth and jobs creation where most in need on the continent.

Collaboration among African governments is the only way mobilization of enough could be achieved from the revenues individual governments are earning from the ongoing development and exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources within their jurisdictions for investing as the multinational African seed capital required to enable optimal development of foundation economic infrastructures like hydro, coal, natural gas and nuclear based power generation and transmission; interconnected railway networks, airports, water dams; and fresh water, oil and natural gas pipelines. These are required for the stimulation investments in the economic growth potentials Africa is gifted in its population of more than one billion, favourable climate throughout the year, agriculture, fisheries, forestry, manufacturing and in continental, as well as global trading to speed up economic growth and reduce joblessness on the continent.

Even though many governments on the African continent are already very well aware of the need to use the revenues they earn from the development and exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources in the development of the foundation economic infrastructures required to stimulate investments for jobs creation and economic growth in order to ensure benefit for generations, the intensive development and exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources going on the continent for many years now has failed to contribute significantly in the development of the foundation economic infrastructures required for the continent. Failed because African countries are yet to realize the importance of multinational African collaboration in the mobilization of the revenues African governments are earning from the development and exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources within their jurisdictions for investing as the multinational African seed capital required to enable optimal development of the huge and costly foundation economic infrastructures of scale needed to stimulate investments for jobs creation and economic growth on the continent.

Multinational collaboration is what enabled the small, and therefore unable to achieve by going individually, countries of European Union (EU) to mobilize enough of the huge seed capital they invested in the development of the foundation economic infrastructures of scale in all sectors of modern economy in all countries of EU and EU as whole, enabling EU to become one of the most attractive for investments and prosperous worldwide. They realized and picked on the right course so quickly because history gave them the harsh cold winters to grow in and without any opportunity to beg from others or live on their produce.

Like the EU, the African continent is also fragmented into small, and therefore unable to achieve by going individually, countries which are yet to realize the importance of collaboration in their mobilization of the seed capital required for the optimal development of the foundation economic infrastructures required to stimulate investments for jobs creation and economic growth in all countries of the continent and the continent as a whole by emulating the footsteps of countries in the EU on the same. As a consequence, it is not much of the huge wealth foreign multinationals are creating in their development and exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources on the continent is been invested back on the continent for jobs creation and economic growth in the sectors of economy other than the development and exploitation of nonrenewable natural resources because the individual going by African governments failed to deliver the foundation economic infrastructures which were required to stimulate the investing back.

The individual going practiced by countries on the African continent in the mobilization of seed capital for the development of their foundation economic infrastructures won’t deliver optimal stimulation of investments in the individual countries of the continent and the continent as a whole because practice does not allow to consider the economic growth potentials, the foundation economic infrastructure needs and the contributory potentials of individual countries in the multinational African mobilization of the seed capital required for optimal designing and development of the foundation economic infrastructures required for stimulation of investments in all countries and the continent as a whole. Also, individual going by countries on the African continent won’t deliver the best fit of the individually designed and developed foundation economic infrastructures of the individual countries on the would be collectively designed master plan of the optimal foundation economic infrastructures required for all African countries and the continent as a whole.

Collaboration among African countries in the optimal designing, financing and development of the foundation economic infrastructures required for the stimulation of investments for jobs creation and economic growth in all African countries and the African continent as a whole should consider the following:
Estimates of the potentials of nonrenewable mineral resources and the revenues contributed to the governments by their ongoing and would be future development and exploitation in all countries on the continent (one); Estimates of the already developed and yet to be developed economic growth potentials existing in all countries on the continent and their costs and benefits (two); Foundation economic infrastructures required to enable development of the economic growth potentials existing in all countries on the continent (already developed and yet to be developed), and their costs. (three); Designing of the continental master plan/layout of the continental foundation economic infrastructures required for optimal stimulation of investments in all countries on the African continent and the African continent as a whole and costs per element, based on one, two and three above (four).

Developed master plan (four) should be made available to all countries on the African continent to enable them to consider when designing their detailed national economic infrastructures to ensure best fit on the continental master plan and mutual benefit for all who are sharing the continental foundation economic infrastructures. For example, development of the continental railway system on the continental master plan of foundation economic infrastructures should focus on ensuring uniformity of technical specifications and connectivity among neighbouring national and/or regional sections of the continental railway system in order to enable maximization in the utilization and sharing of idle railway sections, locomotives and wagons among countries and regions on the continent.

Also, developed master plan (four) should be basis in the creation of specialized multinational African companies responsible for the mobilization of the seed capitals required in the development and operation of different economic foundation infrastructures featuring on the continental master plan. For example, a multinational African company could be established to specialize in the mobilization of the African multinational seed capital required to finance development of African nuclear power plant(s) or the Inga hydropower generation potential in the Democratic republic of Congo which feature on the continental master plan. Individual countries or group of several neighbouring countries on the African continent could handle mobilization of the seed capitals required and development of small foundation economic infrastructures whose implementation is not so costly.

Collaboration among African countries in the mobilization of seed capital for the development of foundation economic infrastructures could also include mobilization for investing in private sector lead strategic industries such as the Indian and Atlantic Oceans born large scale fishing and processing and the natural gas based fertilizers manufacturing which have major impact on downstream jobs creation and economic growth in several sectors of the continental economy.

Source:

http://www.wavuti.com/4/post/2013/02/collaboration-among-african-countries-is-a-must-in-jobs-infrastructures-development-and-economic-growth.html#ixzz2M1vmy0k8

--
Jobs in Africa - www.wejobs.blogspot.com
International Jobs - www.jobsunited.blogspot.com

26Feb/130

Kenya: The Reform Change Accord Mandate for New Constitution

From: Judy Miriga

Folks,

The Reform Change Accord mandated for New Constitution shall not be legitimate if there are conflicting views of non-compliance to the Law in such instances as:

1) Integrity examination threshold to avoid conflict of interests

2) Blocking Diasporas Right to vote and collectively engage in the electioneering process as Mandated in the New Constitution.

3) Flaws noticed in Election processes from failing to provide sufficient Educational awareness to voters in the local community to understand concepts of the New Constitutional management and public service deliver prospects so that people engage in electioneering from informed choices

4) Irregularly awarding Certificates to favor some contestants under questionable circumstances and without going through credible balanced procedure for background check and clearance under accountability and transparency

5) Failing to provide an Independent Transitional team headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court according to the New Constitutional mandate in honor of Reform Accord Agreement of Chapter six

6) Without resolving issues of Land Grabbing and putting those responsible to face justice

7) Failing to resettle the Internally displaced as demanded

8) The unconstitutional and irregular way Kibaki took to Gazette Land Commissioners is worrisome and is seen as an indication that Land Grabbing will continue to be a sore in Kenya for more decades to come before it can finally be resolved

9) Failing to resolve and put behind bars those involved in saga of the Goldenberg and Anglo Leasing scandals

10) Failure to effectively resolve election mishaps, flaws with rigging anomalies for example such like those found to have been engaged by Kimemia and thereby disqualifying Kimemia or demanding reasons why he should not be forced to resign for engaging in politics with intention to deliberately manipulate and confuse legitimacy of election process from being free and fair.

The second debate which just ended proved from the candidates horse’s mouth that corruption and land grabbing is real which many of them are guilty of and accepted responsibilities but denied they did any wrong and therefore, we believe these were deliberate reasons why candidates avoided Integrity Examination threshold background checks for which case clearance in awarding of certificates are suspicious shrouded with lots of doubt whether election of March 4th 2013 shall be peaceful, credible, free and fair.

It is our considered justified appeal to do the right thing the first time by suspending March 4th by a few more months in order to rectify the flaws and anomalies so that we are able to put the Transitional Team in the right perspective before we allow conflict of special interest to spoil for the Reform Change we have struggled for all these years.

Judy Miriga
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA

http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com

- - - - - - - - - - -

Candidates tackle integrity, wealth gap in final debate

Updated Tuesday, February 26 2013 at 07:35 GMT+3

By Moses Njagih

Nairobi, Kenya: The second and final presidential debate took off last evening with all candidates, including Jubilee flag-bearer Uhuru Kenyatta, whose side was at first hesitant, in the BrookHouse School auditorium.

The candidates were first made to confront the contentious issues of economic woes facing Kenya, and in particular the high cost of living, the minimum wage and the huge gap between the poor and the rich.

The candidates were later to move over to the issue of land ownership, emotive and sensitive in the country because of historical inequities and disparities in distribution, particularly at Independence.

The issue generated the hottest debate as pressure piled on Jubilee flag bearer Uhuru to declare if indeed it were true if the family of Kenya’s Founding President Mzee Jomo Kenyatta indeed owns “half of the land” in Kenya.

He was also asked by one of the candidates how he would impartially and fairly address the issue of land ownership when he himself was an interested party.

But the question of the day was how many acres the Kenyatta family, which Uhuru defended, sourced every hectare it has on a willing-buyer-willing-seller basis, own. Uhuru avoided the question but later conceded in Taveta alone, the family owns 30,000 acres, of which it has donated 4,000 acres to squatters in that specific parcel.

Grabbed land

But Raila, who was also put on the spot over his family’s acquisition of former publicly-owned Kisumu Molasses Plant, brought in the fact that Uhuru’s running mate, Mr William Ruto, is facing accusations that he grabbed land from an internally displaced person in his Eldoret North constituency.

“I have never been accused of grabbing any land. The land we own as a family is acquired through willing-buyer-willing-seller. We shall ensure that land is used as a factor of production,’’ Uhuru responded while insisting, “the National Land Commission should be left to handle the emotive issue of land in this country.”

“No organisation from Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission to all other State agencies have come up with any accusations against me on land,” Uhuru went on.

Responding to accusations against him and his family Raila said: “There was money that was collected out of the deal (sale of Kisumu Molasses Plant). This plant was acquired through an auction alongside 15 other companies. The government had acquired the land compulsorily. Sh2.9 million was collected from some people. The public owns part of the shareholding and are represented in the company.’’

In response to the land issue, Amani presidential candidate Musalia Mudavadi, said: “There is no way one can hide in terms of land ownership in this country. You can use whatever names but it will be known. The constitution says there is a minimum and maximum of what one can own.”

Mudavadi, who is a Land economist, warned that the issue of minimum and maximum acreage must be handled carefully so as not to bring economic ruin by undermining production and land usage for common good.

Alliance for Real Change candidate Mohammed Abduba Dida and his Safina counterpart, as well as Raila, declared their governments would repossess stolen public land, but through constitutional means.

“People at the Coast have been treated unfairly by successive governments, land is not given to the locals. In Rift Valley the situation is the same. We now have a good Constitution and National Land Policy. What is required is to give an enabling environment for the commission to operate,’’ said Muite. Eagle Alliance candidate Peter Kenneth said: “The real issues about land is enforcement. If we don’t deal with this matter concisely, it will continue to haunt us.”

In response to Raila’s claim on frustration of State efforts to address the land issue, Kenneth asked: “Who are the vested interests stopping us from moving forward?”

Goldenberg notoriety

Dida cited complaints in Kiambu County against the Kenyatta family and asked Uhuru how he could be trusted by other parts of the country when his own people are crying about alleged injustice visited on them by the Kenyatta family and Jomo Kenyatta’s government in general.

Before going to land question the moderators — KTN’s Joe Ageyo and Royal Media’s Udwak Amimo — confronted the candidates with direct questions on issues that over the years have tended to cast a long shadow on their personal integrity.

First to take the question of integrity was Muite, who was asked about claims by businessman Kamlesh Pattni of the Goldenberg notoriety that he extorted Sh20 million from him.

Muite declared the scheme was part of the propaganda set up by the regime then against him for spearheading battle against looting public resources. He argued the Law Society, which he then chaired, instituted a private suit on the scandal.

He said that he did not receive any money as alleged, and that Justice Samuel Bosire’s judicial commission on Goldenberg upheld his position. “Individuals associated with me may have got the money but Mr Muite did not receive any,” he said in defence.

Second was Mudavadi, who was asked on the adverse claims on his handling of Goldenberg scandal while Finance minister, as well alleged role in the Nairobi City’s ‘cemetery scandal’, while Minister for Local Government.

On both accusations the Deputy Prime Minister defended himself, saying he in fact was the one who tried to stop the scandals.

On Goldenberg, Mudavadi said: “The law was changed during my tenure at the treasury and it was during the time that stopped this scandal. The Bosire Commission cleared me of any offence”.

Whistle blowing

Karua was asked questions on how she, as Justice minister, handled the Anglo Leasing matter, which claimed the life of a whistle-blower, late David Munyekei.

Karua also denied claims of demonising former anti-graft tsar John Githongo over his whistleblowing role, saying he only defended the government’s position.

“Actually it was during my tenure that the anti-corruption agencies did their work and under my recommendations, ministers named in Githongo’s dossier stepped aside for investigations and have never forgiven me,” she said.

Raila was asked about Kazi Kwa Vijana and maize scandals, and the sale of Kisumu Molasses Plant to his family. He defended himself saying the claims against him were unfounded.

On the Kazi Kwa Vijana scandal, Raila said his office was only coordinating the programme.

The debate took off after recorded pleas by the candidates to their supporters to accept the verdict of the March 4 exercise, and where there would be disputes, resort to the measures mapped out by the Constitution for appeal.

Dida was confronted with a question of how as owner of a business agency recruiting Kenyans for overseas jobs as domestic helps, where they end up underpaid and harassed, he would be expected to rule Kenya when he is not helping in job creation locally.

“I have an agency out to help the plight of Kenyans in the Middle East. This is because of the funny salaries Kenyans get here, that is why I left my job,’’ he responded.

National budget

Prof James Kiyiapi of Restore and Build Kenya party was asked about the loss of over Sh100 million in Free Primary Education programme, while he was the Permanent Secretary.

He explained he was innocent as he had just joined the Ministry of Education and asked the candidates, who were in government then, to explain why the truth had not been uncovered on the FPE funds.

Uhuru was asked about the ‘computer error’ that rocked the Ministry of Finance’s national budget when he joined the ministry and read his first Financial Statement. Uhuru denied there was any financial loss and insisted it was just an error.

After the debate, watched by millions across the World, the candidates are now left to make their final statement on the race for Kenya’s Fourth Presidency, on their final rallies over the weekend.

John Okumu26 February 2013 10:19 AM
I loved this second debate,it was more substantive and thorough.I loved Amimos tough questions on integrity and corruption which caught the candidates off guard.This is how any public contender should be questioned.It clearly emerged that even those whom we think are squeaky clean like Mudavadi may have some explaining to do after all.All in all, we Kenyans need alot of work where integrity and corruption is concerned.It is clear that it has been so entrenched that what was shocking is actually talking about it.Things are changing fast .Martha is the only one that did not seem to have alot of entreched integrity issues.So i rank Peter Kenneth,Martha Karua,Kalonzo Musyoka high on the non corruption issues.Uhuru did very well in answering the questions i have to admit.Kenneth had done his homework especially on the question of what the minimum wage should be which i think Kiyapai gave a long winded answer on this question.The candidates were very well prepared all in all and it is goog for policy formulation in Kenya.All those good ideas can be incorporated so that everyone can win

Makao26 February 2013 12:09 AM
There were fairly good responses today on questions compared to first debate. However, there were flip-flops all over where candidates failed to explicitly explain how they will in details manage economy. Further, Uhuru talked of controlling price of products meaning the government will decide how maximum a product can cost. Economically, this is wrong and can't apply. Price ceiling is a disastrous measure that can not apply. Price of commodities are defined and determined by market forces and strength. Trying to set price limit maximum or minimum will lead to situations witnessed in 90's like hooding of products, high demand and low supply or non at all. Slup title deeds? How and who will determine who qualifies for land title deed there for example in Kibera? Government once announced that residents were to be allocated upgraded housing by government, it was open of hell-gate of corruption. People all over rushed there claiming to residents including the wealthy and influential.

steve jakomala26 February 2013 7:29 AM
i fail to understand why the politicians were punching with gloves as far as land issues are concern. Uhuru accepted that in Taita Taveta alone they own 30,000 ha of land, Dida gave a report about complaints in Kiambu there are several thousands of other ha of land else where. the questions are: being a president who had the prerogative to dish out land and at the same time had access to the national fund is it a coincidence that he owns these huge pieces of land without either allocating them to himself irregularly or using coercion to aquire them. Uhuru wants to be the president, the chief abitrator to kenyans, how can he convince those who looted this country to return the looted property including land if he can not convince his family to do the same? the evidence againsl Rutos land case is telling, how can two top people with vested intrest in illegally aquired land preside over land injustices in this country leave alone the serious case at the hague? Kenyans let us put ourselves first not tribe not community

Sharp minded voter26 February 2013 10:25 AM
Politicians are such lairs when they are conducting campaigns. The opponents of Uhuru keeps attack him about the lands he and his family own, Martha accepted that what she said that Uhuru owns half of Kenya is an outright exaggeration, Raila "my brother Uhuru is just an innocent inheritor". Marha was further put to stop because when she was a minister the report of who has big tracks of land was produced and Uhuru and his family was not even on the list. Uhuru categorically stated that he has not been accused of impropriety or fraudulent acquisition of land and has no court cases pertaining to land and put Raila at task to state which court matters he has. We may conclude that this land issue is emotive and an imaginative creation of politicians just as acampaign gimmick that there politicians pull to discredit their Uhuru and a plot to smear mud and taint his name. He is free from corruption. The debate set matters straight and it is very wrong to use lies and propaganda on campaign platform to cheat Kenyans
--
Jobs in Africa - www.wejobs.blogspot.com
International Jobs - www.jobsunited.blogspot.com

26Feb/130

An American who fell in love with Kenya and its people is planning for a big international forum in Nairobi in the year 2016

Writes Leo Odera Omolo In Kisumu City

Please find attached is our official News Release in a PDF format. Please note that we live in the 21st Century and News Releases are no longer written words, we now use both Multi-Media and Social Media to promote change and ideas in the world. We created this document in format that goes not only to the Kenyan Media, this document should go directly to the people of Kenya. We both know what happen in the “Middle East” with the “Arab Spring.” Social media can bring change in the world. In order for Africa to move into a 21st Century paradigm we must use “Social Media.”

Let me explain a very important concept to you. We are asking the “Republic of Kenya” to honor its “African/American Family” with a “Formal State Reception.” State Receptions are only given to Heads of State.

[placeholders for 3 images]

In the history of Africa and African/Americans being taken as “slaves to America” not African country has ever offered “African/Americans a Formal State Reception.” A formal State Reception has to come from and be agreed upon by both the U.S. and Kenya State Departments. It is one thing to give a “Head of State” a Formal State Reception but how do you give African/American people a “Formal State Reception.?” This means that the total Republic of Kenya government and people must format a way to honor its “African/American Family.”

Please note that I have taken groups to Kenya for over a decade and I understand both Kenya and America and I am an expert in this area. I have an above average background regarding Kenya’s culture and history. Please understand that travel to Kenya will be long and grueling and beyond the usual travel time that most Americans have experienced. We have to look at “Jet Lag” and a way to promote such an event. We must develop a comprehensive “marketing strategy” that will attract 1000’s of African/Americans to Kenya.

For the record we have created a “Brand Name” for the event. The most noted African word in the English Language is “SAFARI.” It was American writer Earnest Hemingway that introduced the word Safari into the English language. The Kenyan Government must officially expand the meaning of the word “SAFARI” We give its many acronyms.

We have 5 major components as a way to promote the event. We must make the event a spiritual movement.

1. The Safari Home Coming Celebration is the story of the Prodigal Son. Preachers worldwide will relate Africa’s Children coming home to the “Prodigal Son” in the Bible

2. The event will start in Memphis, Tennessee. Memphis is important because Memphis was once the “Slave Capital of the World.” Symbolically the Children of Africa come from Memphis, Tennessee to Kenya.

3. Dr. Martin Luther King was Killed in Memphis and this event honors Dr. King’s Legacy by us bringing the gauntlet of Dr. King to Kenya

4. This event connects and completes the Legacy of Tom Mboya. Tom Mboya went to America to help Kenya students. That connects started by Mboya brings African/Americans home to Kenya.

5. Kenya is the home of Barack Obama Sr. and all African/Americans must travel to the Ancestry home of America’s President Barack Obama Sr.

Rev. Otura it is urgent that the Kenyan Government and the Kenyan people officially agree to honor its African/American family. Once the agreement is agreed upon we will take 3 years to plan and promote the celebration. We will have so many jobs to do to promote the event. When it comes to the area of the “Christian Faith” we expect you to tell the story that only such a celebration is from “God.” Rev. Otura since you and I connected you and other Kenyan ministers will visits 100’s of churches in America to tell them to come home to Africa. We must develop our website so that anyone in America can simple look on their Cell phone and see videos of the event. Since the event will take place in Kenya’s “High Season” Kenya will not have enough Hotel Rooms.

Such an event will be like the Olympics and it takes a lot of planning and infrastructure. South Africa has better “infrastructure” for such an event. Outside of Nairobi many areas cannot accommodate many African/Americans. Such an event will change the culture of Kenya.

Rev. Otura I would like to thank you for you help. Prior to our going to Kenya we can do a lot of the preliminary work out of the way. We must meet with every Airline that travels from America to Kenya to work out “Budget Travel packages.” We must make the trip affordable to 1000’s of people who could not otherwise travel to Africa.

The most Important Factor

The most important element to the “Safari Homecoming Celebration” is the Barack Obama factor. We must get the date and agreement signed so that President Barack Obama Jr. can officially put the event on his calendar. Because the Kenya State Department and American State Department will sign an official Historic Agreement this will allow President Obama to officially come to Kenya and be the Key note speaker. Please note that in July of 2016 the President will only have 6 months left in office. Hillary Clinton will be running for President. Since this event will be on the “World Stage” Hilleary Clinton may attend the event. Many American legislators will come from America. Because some many American legislators will be in Kenya all African leaders will be at the event.

When you add up African leaders, Church leaders, The President Kenya will not have enough hotel rooms. We will need tents and need camps to support this event. President Obama will come to Kenya. President Obama loves Kenya and he will come to Kisumu.

I think that I have written enough. I think you understand how urgent and important the work we are doing. Now is the time for you to return home to assist in promoting this event. You must stand on stage with President Obama.

End

26Feb/130

KENYA: BIG SURPRISE AS UHURU TURNED UP FOR SECOND DEBATE

From: Ouko joachim omolo
The News Dispatch with Omolo Beste in images
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2013

Kenyans were surprised yesterday when Uhuru Kenyatta appeared on second presidential debate when his party, TNA had sent a letter to the Presidential Debate Steering Committee explaining why Uhuru could not attend the second debate.

The party had cited bias and failure of the moderators to ask other candidates other than Uhuru hard questions. The party claimed moderato Linus Kaikai had a bone to chew with their candidate and that he had been coached on how to set the stage for direct attacks on Uhuru. Kenya’s first-ever Presidential Debate took place on 11th February, 2013.

The party claimed it was profoundly unprofessional and tasteless for Kaikai to use the ICC indictments as a platform for allowing the other candidates to ride roughshod over Uhuru without equally raising questions related to their suitability and competency.

The argument was based on the fact that if Kaikai had genuine intentions of exposing the weaknesses of all the candidates in the debate, then he would have dredged into the shady past of candidates like the Prime Minister, the Right Honourable Raila Odinga, Hon Peter Kenneth, Paul Muite, Hon Martha Karua and Hon Musalia Mudavadi, and former PS John ole Kiyiapi, all of whom are burdened by varying degrees of either graft allegations or issues of moral probity.

They wondered why Kakai did not probe Odinga over his alleged role in several multi-billion shilling instances of grand corruption; most notably the Triton, Maize, and Kazi Kwa Vijana scandals that have blighted the Prime Minister’s Office for a number of years.

In addition, the two moderators failed to put Deputy Prime Minister Musalia Mudavadi on the spot for his alleged role in the complex Goldenberg Scandal when he served as Finance Minister.

Narc-Kenya leader Martha Karua was not grilled on her dubious role in the South Ngariama Ranch and allegations of moral impropriety, all hard issues in the public domain.

Peter Kenneth was not questioned on his suspected role in scandals involving the Kenya Re-Insurance Corporation and the Kenya Football Federation (KFF) when he was the head of the two institutions.

And James ole Kiyiapi was not questioned on his suspect role in the Education Fund scandal while Paul Muite was not taken to task on allegations that the Goldenberg Scandal chief architect Kamlesh Pattni paid him KSh20 million.

Pattni made the allegations, complete with facsimiles of the cheques involved, and a senior business associate of Muite’s confirmed that the cheques were indeed banked in their firm’s account.

The party alluded that perhaps the choice of Kaikai as Moderator was not a well-thought-out decision by the organizers. This moderator has previously and publicly displayed a soft spot for the Prime Minister.

Kaikai they claimed is known to have expressed interest in seeking a parliamentary seat in Narok on an ODM ticket in the 2007 elections, but was reportedly talked out of his ambitions and promised the post of Director of Communications in a Raila Presidency.

The party further claimed that some of the organizers were keen to use the Debate to further their own political agendas and support their favoured candidates.. For example, Samuel K. Macharia, the proprietor of Royal Media Services (RMS) – which contributed one of the moderators – has openly opposed Kenyatta’s candidature and aligned his broadcasting empire to bolstering Odinga’s campaigns.

They claimed Macharia was recently appointed head of CORD’s so-called Summit, becoming the first media owner in Kenya to participate directly in the affairs of a political formation.

The second debate was intended to cover economy, land and international relations. KTN’s Joe Ageyo and Citizen TV’s Uduak Amimo were slated to moderate. The first debate covered governance, social services, health and education, security and resource management.

Kenyatta has maintained that the ICC charges shouldn’t affect the election and has dismissed potential sanctions that could come from cautious foreign governments by claiming that the economy will survive on trade with neighbouring countries and the Chinese.

But even if sanctions were to be imposed on Kenyans, the fact that elections in Kenya are tribally based, Uhuru will still have votes from his fellow tribes, and with William Ruto as his running mate, Kenyatta will have strong support from both Central Province and the Rift Valley.

The two communities would not mind whether Uhuru’s government will reform land, efficient use of government land, a reverse in the pattern of fragmentation, with smallholder farmers on private land, and whether to establish individual land rights for those on community land or not. What they want is ‘our own has made it’.

Fr Joachim Omolo Ouko, AJ
Tel +254 7350 14559/+254 722 623 578
E-mail omolo.ouko@gmail.com
Facebook-omolo beste
Twitter-@8000accomole

Real change must come from ordinary people who refuse to be taken hostage by the weapons of politicians in the face of inequality, racism and oppression, but march together towards a clear and unambiguous goal.

-Anne Montgomery, RSCJ UN Disarmament Conference, 2002

26Feb/130

Making a Difference Through Geothermal Energy

From: Yona Maro

In this International Year of Sustainable Energy for All, it is important to recognize that energy is a prime driver of economic development, and access to energy has direct positive impacts on the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Inadequate access reduces societies’ opportunities for meeting the basic needs provided by energy services and opportunities for gainful employment.

Link: http://unu.edu/publications/articles/making-a-difference-through-geothermal-energy-2.html

--
www.wejobs.blogspot.com Jobs in Africa
www.jobsunited.blogspot.com International Job Opportunities
www.naombakazi.blogspot.com

--
Jobs in Africa - www.wejobs.blogspot.com
International Jobs - www.jobsunited.blogspot.com

26Feb/130

World: ?AIDS Rights? A letter from an accuser

From: Kun Chang

Accuser: Chang Kun, male, born on June 6th ,1985, Han nationality, live in 53-2, Fulin Road, Chengguan Town, Linquan County, Fuyang City, Anhui Province.

Accused person: Public Security Bureau?PSB?, Linquan County, Fuyang City, Anhui Province.

Legal Corporate Representation: Chen Qi, director-general of the Linquan City Public Security Bureau.

Accused person: Chen Jie, male, the inspector of Linquan City Public Security Bureau in Dongguan Local Police Station. The telephone number is 13966587511.

Accused person: Gu Jian, male, the original instructor of Linquan City Public Security Bureau in Dongguan Local Police Station. The telephone number is 13805610988.

The request from the accuser:

A?That Chang Yingbin attacked Chang Kun is illegal. Linquan City Public Security Bureau, Anhui Province, should look into the case and Chang Yingbin shall be investigated for his responsibility.

B?Linquan City Public Security Bureau and the Local Police Station in Dongguan didn’t punish the illegal behavior of Chang Yingbin. So the accuser think they are illegal.

C?The accused person Chen Jie and Gu Jian shall be investigated for their misconduct.

The facts and reasons from the accuser:

A?The illegal crime fact of Chang Yingbin attacked Chang Kun. Chang Yingbin was the original deputy director of the Guangming community, Chengguan Town, LinQuan County.

At around ten o 'clock in the morning on April 4, 2012, Chang Yingbin abused Chang Kun in the crossings of Xinjian Road and Gangkou Road (now it is a waste transfer station). Suddenly, Chang Kun was attacked by someone in the back. Then I ran out, and calling "police, someone is hitting me,". They drag and hit me a lot, and I stood up finally , taking hold the box car behind me. The police come over, and also there had some riot police. They asked Chang Kun to the police station and assisted in the investigation. Chang Kun stand on the steps, back against the box car, and said to villagers around" I've just been attacked, now the police Meng Xianjing (telephone is 13966583485 )asked me to go to the police station to assist their investigation, I am not caught! I'll come back soon!" the police Meng also loudly said "yes!"

On April 4, at about eleven, Chang Kun was in Dongguan Local Police Station to be investigated. Then he asked the police, why not control the attackers, otherwise they would continue to hit. The instructor of Dongguan Local Police Station GuJian (telephone is 13805610988) said a lot about to protect Chang Kun. At this time, Chang Kun heard that the attackers hit someone again. At last I knew that my mother was attacked by the brain when she was on the phone. She was taken to a hospital by emergency ambulance.

At 12:38 on April 4, Chang kun’s head suddenly was very heavy. Chang Kun can hardly support and put the head on the chair. Chang kun required the police to make a record of the happenings , and the police did it.

But at 14:10 on April 4, Chang kun and some friends came to conference room on the third floor of Kaiyue Wangchao Hotel, Linquan County. When Chang Kun sat on the chair and looked on the phone. Chang Yingbin and some other people suddenly rushed into the conference room. I fall on the floor on my back and lost consciousness.

About 19 o 'clock on April 4, the police Meng (his telephone is 13966583485)came to the Brain Surgery in-Patient Department 11 beds of People's Hospital in Linquan County to find Chang Kun. He made a record for Chang Kun. At that time Chang Kun have woke up, and the brain consciousness was relatively clear. But Chang Kun had difficulty in speaking and couldn’t completely say a word. Chang Kun’s upper body can’t move flexible, especially the head can’t turn.

B?The Public Security Bureau took sides in the criminals and his negative act is illegal.

(a), The police on the scene did not take measures to stop the criminal Chang Yingbin, and also didn’t take appropriate measures after the case happened. So that it led directly to Chang Kun and Chang Kun’s mother were attacked again.

At about ten in the morning on April 4, 2011, two policemen in Dongguan Local Police Station arrived at the scene. But they didn’t stop Chang Yingbin’s bad behavior, but took Chang Kun to the police station to make a record. Chang Yingbin beat Chang kun in the presence of the police. So Chang Kun was repeatedly attacked, and the clothes were also tore lousy. When Chang Kun asked the police, why not control the attackers, otherwise they would continue to hit someone? Amazingly, Gujian, the original instructor of Linquan City Public Security Bureau in Dongguan Local Police Station, said what they did are trying to protect Chang Kun. If so, Why don't you put the violent catch up? Why don’t you stop the attackers when Chang Kun was under beaten? It’s all nonsense, Gujian and the attackers are in the same gang. He is an accomplice dressed in the police uniform. Chang Kun suggest to the leaders that you should get rid of him. Chang Kun’s mother was attacked by the brain when she was on the phone. She was taken to a hospital by emergency ambulance. It’s really can’t speak all his bad behaviors!

On 14:10 in the April 4, Chang Kun was in the conference in Kairui Wangchao

Hotel. Chang Yingbin rushed in it and hit Chang Kun. Chang Kun lost consciousness. The Public Security Bureau took sides in the criminals. May be they are in the same gang?If they don't have interest relations, how can they neglect Chang Yingbin’s so bad behavior? They are really in for their own selfish, disregard to the state dignity and the law? !

(b). The negative act of LinQuan County Public Security Bureau and the Dongguan Local Police Station is illegal.

on April 4, 2011 at 11 o 'clock, when Chang Kun was taken to Dongguan Local Police Station to make a record, Chang Kun’s mother was also attacked. On April 4, 2011 in the afternoon, the Public Security Bureau took sides in the criminals and led Chang Kun was attacked again to coma in hospital. All the things, Chang Kun’s father repeated visited LinQuan County Public Security Bureau and Dongguan Local Police Station to ask to punish the murderers all the year. But they all did not take any effective measures, and lack of supervision. In close to a year, they didn’t have any processing results about the case. The criminal Chang Yingbin are still at large.

In addition, Chen Jie(the telephone is 13966587511), the inspector of Dongguan Local Police Station, answered that they were waiting for the instruction of Ge Jinhai, secretary of Chengguan Town.

I am very confused about the relationships between LinQuan County Public Security

Bureau and Chengguan Town? Why the inspector of Dongguan Local Police Station Chen Jie actually need to the instruction of secretary of Chengguan Town GeJinHai? If not so, why LinQuan County Public Security Bureau still don’t handle the case?

According to ninety-ninth regulation of "L aw of the PRC on Penalties for Administration of Public Security": " Public Security Bureau has a time limit about the cases, from the date of acceptance of not more than thirty days; if the case is grave and complicated, the Public Security Bureau can prolong thirty days at the next higher level for approval."

LinQuan County Public Security Bureau neglect the legal regulations of our country.

They maliciously dragged on the case, which is a serious violation of the rights of the accuser Chang Kun! The negative act is illegal. As its agencies, Dongguan Local Police Station disregard our national law, took sides in the criminals, and it is unable to perform a national legal obligation.

In all, the accuser request that the relevant authority should handle the letter. Supervise and correct the wrong act of LinQuan County Public Security Bureau and Dongguan Local Police Station, especially about their negative act and took sides in the criminals. Chang Kun request to punish the criminal Chang Yingbin. Please look into the possible malversation!

Best wishes

Fuyang City Public Security Bureau!

The accuser: Chang Kun

December 17, 2012

Copy to: People's Congress Standing Committee of LinQuan County, People’s Procuratorate of LinQuan County, LinQuan County Commission for Discipline Inspection, Linquan County Supervision Bureau, People's Congress Standing Committee of Fuyang City, Fuyang City Commission for Discipline Inspection, Fuyang City Supervision Bureau, People's Congress Standing Committee of Anhui Province, Anhui Province Commission for Discipline Inspection ,Anhui Province Public Security Bureau, Anhui Province Supervision Bureau, Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, Ministry of Public Security, State Bureau for Letters and Calls.

25Feb/130

Who is Frustrating the Reform Change and Justice in Kenya

From: Judy Miriga

Kenya frustrating justice, says ICC chief prosecutor ………Is it only the ICC Prosecutor Ms. Fatou feeling the Kibaki/Uhuru pressure or evidence of the same is slowly becoming a Reality in the minds of many.

The Truth has seen light and the knowledge of Truth will not allow darkness to bury it again. Darkness therefore is in serious trouble, like a wounded lion, it is dangerously trying to look for escape; so good people, simply follow the rule, be cautious, careful and watchful. Do not allow to be intimidated, stay focused and know that God has always been faithful; we shall overcome………

People, we must take seriously the Reform Change process and take ownership of Kenya from thievers so that we make it “Right The First Time” otherwise, we shall have ourselves to blame.

Something we didn’t know whether it was true or false and for all this time, it has not been put very clearly in the open for a very long time which has remained a silent hot rumor with ears on the ground since I was a child of about 7 years. The story goes that, Kenya was sneakily owned since 1963 under-table by a small group of family members and close friends who secretly put their heads together clandestinely, took Kiapo (oath) and drunk human blood mixed with animal blood with juju and ajawa and agreed and swore in a traditional seal to keep it silent that way within the family and amongst those recruited. If anyone broke the oath or did something different from the seal, that person must summarily be put to death. For one to share in the profits from Kenya’s resources anyway anyhow, one must follow the same trend of kula kiapo of oath-taking which one must drink human blood and liver mixed with animal blood and juju and ajawa before one can be crafted in consideration as one of them or even simply put to be in the leadership of Kenya. This is how the system in Kenya was meant to work which is why after the Colonial Era, when white settlers left, all that land was taken by the Kenyatta family. It is the reason the family own land amounting to half of Kenya in total. If this is true, then there is a big trouble ahead of us in order that we make things right. I read something recently in Kenyas newspaper, which made me believe there could be some truth that if I share adding to my own, more people, will come out to confirm what many of us pocketed in our chests. It is a rumor people know about from the Coastal Region of Mombasa, to the hills of Mt. Kenya down the slopes of Rift Valley into the hills and valley’s including the plains and plateaus of Nyanza Region. If there are people out there ever heard anything of this sort, please confirm or witness in good faith because, it is in sharing that the Truth shall set us all free indeed.

To some extent from political perspectives, I have seen things go wrong over the years but people feared to question, where with this rumor presented by a Kenyan writer in Kenyas newspaper, the rumor seems more clearer and very real than ever before.

Don’t forget people, that the world has conceptually become a small village and Kenya with the rest of Africa cannot afford to be left behind where challenges and competition for Global Market-place need Africa’s resources for Economic Development Success. This cannot wait for another day to make our perspectives right. Now is the time to make real meaningful Reform Change and we cannot remain stuck in the mud for another 50 more wasted years being controlled clandestinely.

Any mistakes that we make now, we shall live with it as a damning scar for the rest of our lives…….It is the will of the people to decide way forward for Kenya through informed choices; but it takes courage to do right.

We must take Responsibilities of Voters Right and participate to make reasonable informed choices that will collectively help to cultivate and plant good seeds for Partnership Progressive Development Agenda that shall produce good governance with just rule of law without corruption, impunity, intimidation, fraud or fear. Those with questionable and suspicious background lacking integrity must be held accountable for their actions before they can be allowed to vie or hold public office. It is peoples Livelihood and Survival which is at stake and that cannot be taken for granted.

As a matter of urgency, we cannot sit back and watch the Finance Ministry being run like a personal or family business affair with land grabbing in Kenya or from any part of Africa where grabbing of land is treated like no criminal offense. It is our constitutional right and human right that demands from us to be united and take collective responsibility measure to protect public interest and security according to Reform Change Accord Agreement and the International Treaty for dignity of Human Rights livelihood and survival.

Reform Accord Agreement of Chapter six:

The Jurisdiction Necessity of Compliance is required to justify Reform Accord Agenda of Chapter Six give credible legitimacy of Integrity Responsibility honoring collective rights of Voter participation without exclusion or discrimination:

Reform Change Agreement Demands Voter Rights be honored and Respected that Proper Educational Training must be conducted responsibly in order that Voters make Informed Choices and know their rights in what to expect in the New Concept of Devolution of Counties in a devolve governance:

The Diaspora:

Ø That the election must be fully inclusive with Diasporas given opportunity of rights to vote as per the Reform constitutional policy;

Ø That the Kenya Community must be provided with sufficient educational training to understand how new structures of County Devolution works in delivering public service with information to understand how the institution of legal services work

Ø That the Police system is overhauled and vetted to provide security services discretely, effectively and efficiently respecting the law

Ø that the devolved administrative institutions will discharge their duties working with county’s public personnel alongside people’s elected representatives to deliver effective and efficient public services to the respective County Communities in an open and transparent manner engaging in progressive development prospects

Ø that People must know in advance before election what to expect from their Counties elected leaders, which is why March 4th 2013 election is fundamentally crucial that it must be done the right way the first time according to Reform Accord Agreement procedure.

Presently, election of March 4th 2013 is showing clear signs of corruption from advance rigging with buying peoples voter IDs while IEBC is giving questionable characters certificates of clean bill of records before proper and credible Integrity Examination threshold for background check is done; Parties primary election nominations were full of conflicts from anomalies and rigging with the whole electioneering process full of mismanagement, discrepancies and flaws. Maybe, the reflection of the Party Primaries nominations failures should be taken as a show-case for mock elections instead of wasting more money on the mock exercise. The Party Primaries proved that the will of the people was not respected or honored. Thus, with confirmation of events currently taking place attest that the election of March 4th 2013 will not be peaceful, credible, free and fair because things have not been done the right way. Before the anomalies are rectified, March 4th 2013 remain flawed and must be differed for a later date. This calls for a credible Transitional Committee to be instituted according to the New Constitution Mandate since the Coalition Government term of office ended by January 30th 2013.

The Election organizers have still time to reconsider making March 4th 2013 election peaceful, credible, free and fair for History of Constitutional Reform to be made right the first time by following Integrity rule of chapter six.

This was not done as it should have and elections are around the corner with one more week to go. IEBC also confirmed that peoples’ voter IDs are still being bought and this is a sign of serious irregularities and misrepresentation taking place that cannot be rectified in just one week. Bottom line, no election under these flawed circumstances can remain peaceful, credible, free and fair…….

A stitch in time saves nine. If you see a crack developing in your house, you do not wait until the crack gets bigger and the house collapses; you save it in time by making necessary repairs before it falls apart. This is the same with Reform Change in Kenya today. As we are in the process of repairing damages of corruption with impunity, we do not return the same people who are master-minders of corruption to continue with the mess making it worse and difficult for Reform to take roots. We must get rid of the corrupt and replace them with new ones for a change with a hope that things might get better.

To do this, the people must be knowledgeable and be prepared in advance to understand consequences of corruption and the benefit of Reform Change and how people must elect those who care for public mandate, so that people are able to make rightful informed choices in conformity to the Reform Change Agreement. No one should be taken for a ride through ignorance or be excluded from voting maliciously.

If March 4th 2013 election is in dispute for any reason seen to be accused from election flaws, rigging locking out Diaspora from voting; consequences of which shall make the election illegitimate, nul and void. One such grievance as clear as that of Diasporas purposefully curved out against their constitutional rights and blocked from voting cannot be disputed. There are reasonable good evidence of political engineering maneuvers to scuttle the election to fit a certain fashion with an aim of rigging, that too cannot be disputed. For this reason, election of March 4th 2013 will be considered not credible but rigged; and as such, it shall not be free and fair.

These are consequences we can avoid if election is fully inclusive accommodating the Diasporas voting rights and according to the constitutional policy for Integrity examination threshold for background check is adhered to. This is a procedural rule according to chapter 6 of the Constitution. If the procedure is according to the Law without cover-up or false excuses, we shall be safe in carrying the Reform Election in a credible acceptable manner, free and fair. These are crucial reasons why deferment of March 4th 2013 is most important to be given utmost urgent consideration within these last moments before election is in default.

Signs of Trouble when authority of Justice is threatened:

These scare tactics are criminal in nature, and are as dangerously flawed as they are unconstitutional with intention to frustrate and intimidate the Supreme Court from discharging its duty in order to escape justice cannot be tolerated nor is it acceptable. They are the same old tactics we have witnessed in the past every election time following the same pattern in the past 50 years. They are clandestinely a pre-organized plan to stage rigging of election for the corrupt Status Quo to continue stay in power. The question is, who looses and bears the brunt of pain and long suffering at the end of the day? This is why, with the Reform Change, we must act wiser than before.

Today, Chief Justice Mutunga of Supreme Court is facing fear factor of threats whose intention is to frustrate, intimidate and manipulate him. If this can happen to the Chief Justice whose docket gives him Independence of autonomy from other Government Institutions with good security, how can the ordinary ICC Hague witnesses with normal ordinary Kenyans match up with the threats from the machinery of the Status Quo who are without enough security, don’t you think they are worse off???

These are concerns we must consider if we truly want to stay away from such corrupt environment full of impunity. This is why, it was wrong for suspects of ICC Hague to have been given certificate for clean bill of records to contest for the Public Offices when they are listed as suspects at the ICC Hague, where ICC Hague have not cleared them. We shall be defeating and challenging the work of ICC Hague by rewarding the suspects with clean bill of records when ICC Hague holds them suspect. We cannot play a double standard cards in the Integrity threshold for Reform. If from the horses mouth came “Don’t be vague it is Hague” that was the in-thing slogan, who are you to give them a clean bill of record??? Why are we being vague now when we were told not to be vague it is Hague. What’s wrong with you people.

In our minds and hearts the issues of 2007/8 have not been cleared. Today there are fears from signs of the repeat of the same. Why are we contradictory confuse the Reform Accord Agreement of chapter 6, with the Old Constitution. The Reform Constitution Policy demands declaration for the sources of wealth, checks and balances for accountability and transparency which Uhuru as the Finance Minister has failed to be in compliance, running the Finance Ministry as personal and family business affair.

Are we therefore going to engage leaders who use public power to threaten justice and remain uncooperative??? If those who thrive in corruption are capable to be stubborn now, what shall become when they are Presidents???

See what ICC Prosecutor Ms Bensouda Fatou had to say about Failure to cooperate:

International Criminal Court (ICC) Chief Prosecutor Ms. Fatou Bensouda addressing the press at Serena Hotel, Nairobi on October 22, 2012 said that, she may be compelled to seek other nations’ help in forcing Kenya’s hand Hague prosecutor tell court that she has been denied access to witnesses such as MP Kapondi and PCs who served in clash areas and says she isn’t allowed to see suspects’ wealth declaration forms or intelligence reports that, she may be also forced to seek assistance from foreign countries to compel Kenya to give the court access to government officers and security agents.

“In her submissions, she accused the government of failing to cooperate with the ICC by not giving access to Provincial Commissioners and Police Chiefs who were in charge of areas which were hit most by the post-election chaos.

Consequently, ICC Hague Prosecutor Ms Bensouda Fatou indicated to the Trial Judges that she may amend her list of witnesses and evidence against the four suspects in future if the Kenya government agrees to give her access to the officers………Without doubt, nothing malicious but very intelligent proposal, and went on to explain that;…….“These materials and or persons are the subject of certain governmental and or institutional restrictions for which the Prosecution has requested cooperation from a number of states pursuant to their co-operation obligations under Part 9 of the Statute, but which have not yet been received,” she goes on.

Sources also said the government has blocked the ICC from accessing wealth declarations of the suspects, freezing their accounts and reports of the National Security Intelligence Service at the time of the post election violence………..“The prosecution hereby gives notice to the Chamber that in future, it may seek leave to amend the list of witnesses and or the list of evidence pursuant to the requirements of Regulation 35(2) of the Regulations of the Court if it obtains certain materials that it seeks to tender into evidence or succeeds in securing cooperation of certain witnesses that it has identified that it wishes to interview,” says the Prosecutor.

Ms Bensouda was also said to have requested to interview Mt Elgon MP Fred Kapondi who chairs the Parliamentary Committee on Security but Prof Muigai reportedly told the ICC Prosecutor that the MP had the last decision on whether he wanted to be interviewed or not.

Attorney General Prof Githu Muigai is said to have required the ICC team to make formal applications to access the said records with a requirement that it will take a Cabinet approval for The Hague investigation to access NSIS reports. The Cabinet of Transition is assumed headed by Kimemia…….

Faced with such challenges in a case that she is determined to prove that Mr Kenyatta, Mr Ruto, Mr Muthaura and Mr Sang bore the greatest responsibility, the ICC prosecutor appears to be ready to seek the assistance of foreign countries and agencies to gain access to the witnesses and evidence.

“The Prosecution may also address the Chamber, when and if necessary, pursuant to Articles 93(1)(l) and 64(6)(b) of the Rome Statute, to obtain a request to one or more States Parties to provide assistance with respect to facilitating access to the above mentioned persons and materials or requiring witnesses’ attendance before the Court,” said Ms Bensouda.

“The Prosecution has already approached several State parties, including the government of Kenya, in order to gain access to such individuals and materials. Discussions regarding the terms and conditions of such access are still ongoing,” she went on.

How can ICC then be blamed for not making it right the first time when Government system is so manipulative, blocking and making it difficult to access records needed by the Court with other information that are required when elements to frustrate such move is solidly put in place by Kibaki which makes it even more impossible to make the right moves without fear factor hovering over legal justice freedom to even address or resolve historical injustices of land grabbing so people can move forward with ease without baggage’s of the past…….

We must agree to make it right the first time because, whatever happens and whatever cost we shall have to endure and pay for good democratic governance with Just Rule of Law shall be worth the struggle, loses and pain we have gone through over the years……At the end of the struggle, we shall all be happy moving forward progressively at peace, united in harmony with each other caring and sharing in love and telling tales of the past in a welcoming environment without harboring painful memories of the past……

Public demands that, it is futile for urgent Finance Ministry to be Audited and report made public before election is done to justify checks and balances proof for credibility in the management of Public Service delivery to ascertain legitimacy in the use of Public Finance loans, funds, grants and gifts of in-kinds disbursed and discharged for public service delivery.

We believe that Uhuru Kenyatta have some serious explaining to do on matters pertaining to a humongous ballooning of public fiscal debt accruement that is continuing to grow by day and people are shrinking into deeper poverty and hunger pain and suffering with daily rising costs of food and other basic needs; this is true with constant insecurities, failing health standards, falling apart of Kenyas Educational system with health and environmental pollution. Joblessness is soaring including severe shortage of energy and water in both urban and the rural. We demand that Uhuru explain to the public why him and Muthaura engaged in twisting the arm of Parliament in order to sneak in dangerous clauses in the Finance Bill.

Finance Minister Uhuru Kenyatta and former Secretary to the Cabinet Francis Muthaura sometimes in December 2011, were accused of trying to sabotage MPs attempt to control Bank Interests and regulate costs of fuel through legislation which the two were adamantly against. An MP Jakoyo Midiwo accused Uhuru of arm-twisting Parliament and intimidating him for trying to amend several laws to control Banking and Energy policies. He proceeded to accuse Finance Minister of delaying Finance Bill to defeat proposals to make several security amendments to be included in Banking and Energy Acts. Muthaura was accused of launching attack on Parliamentarians for allegedly writing a letter on December 6th suggesting that amendments proposed on the Bill are “suicidal” that could “lead to hyperinflation” that could poison Treasury’s negotiations with the IMF, the International Monetary Fund. Did they know something that we did not or are people of Kenya purposefully used as rubberstamp for clandestine gains of special interest networks Kenyan people are not suppose to know about?

Parliament was not able to pass the Controversial Finance Bill without sneaking in dangerous clauses to cushion theft and insecurity from Bank Rates, with Energy’s skyrocketing cost of living which contributed to high rising cost of fuel for which Uhuru stand accused of trying to sabotage the Parliament from protecting Public Mandate interest. Uhuru is seen to enjoy Independence bolstering in greater fiscal public debt allowing domestic basic needs to cost beyond ordinary peoples income average means making public fiscal debt to balloon at 1.7 trillion equivalent to 48% GDP which is considered unsustainable. It is now very clear why Uhuru and team refused to cooperate to declare wealth and be cleared according to the new law under Integrity examination threshold. In public opinion, Uhuru is seen to have contravened the Constitutional order and squashed Public Mandate running the Ministry of Finance like a personal and private business affair discounting and scuttling legality of Peoples mandate in the New Constitution is unacceptable.

Finance Matters are interrelated with those of Land Grabbing:

Land issue in Kenya is a serious matter that cannot be given a blank cheque (check) to continue with business as usual in destroying peoples livelihood and survival through the cancer of corruption and impunity. Land grabbing issue must be resolved instantaneously by putting right people in public office to help resolve and conclude the historical injustices once and for all.

It is a criminal offence and an abuse of power to use public office to satisfy gains of the corrupt and greedy networking with those International Corporate special business interest who use the Chinese as Commission Agents to export land to China to profit network of special interest and transferring the burden accrued in debts on the public shoulders after engaging in questionable circumstances that are of contrast in Conflict of Interest, squandering through embezzlement the utilization of public finances and resources, utilities and facilities in an irregular dishonest manner. This is because there are many leads to indicate there is credible leads of mismanagement in the Finance Ministry with purposeful misappropriation and embezzlements of Public Loans from World Bank and IMF with other Donor Agencies funding that were disbursed to Kenya for Public Projects and programs for Public Health, medical research, educational programs with for those meant for small community business program incentives for Millennium Development Agenda and for the improvement and development of Agricultural land in arid and semi arid of the Coastal Regions (Isiolo, Tana River, Turkwel, Turkana, Kwale, Taita Taveta, Kilifi, Garsen, Garisa, Malindi, Mombasa including the Great Lakes in and around the Lake Victoria, Migingo, Siaya, Migori, Rongo, Oyugis/Ringa Kojwach in the Nyanza region, where Investments earmarked for Energy, Water and the Natural Minerals in such Gold, Diamond, Titunium, Coltan, Iron Ore, Zinc etc., is not benefiting people of Kenya directly but people are moved away from their land to pave way for special business interest. That whatever plan which were made are under serious conspiracy with intention to defraud and steal from the people of Kenya what belong to their family and the community. The loans and funding incurred in the fiscal public debt is not feasible nor sustainable because, funds were re-directed and relocated for other usage and or were misappropriated for which they must be accounted for. We cannot under-estimate costs incurred in the exchange for transfers of such like Public Corporations signed off in a conspiracy theory to blackmail and bankrupt Public Corporations through sneaky transfers to unsecured individual business beefed by public finance expenditure account. We have noted with sadness how Kenya Railways Corporation was dismantled and transferred benefit an Individual sharing with Uganda who paid no penny to get Kenya Railways out of the hands of Kenya Public interest. This is not right. The Kenya Railway Corporation now reads “The Rift Valley Railway”. This is daylight robbery. Today, greater land grabbing is following the same fashion of trend the reason why the Land Commissioners are given a tenure of 6 years, something that can be done in less than 6 months considering the urgency of the matter. This is unacceptable.

As if that is not enough, Kibaki put on gazette the appointment of the Land Commissioners citing powers conferred to him by Section 7, paragraph 8 of the first schedule to the National Land Commission Act. Dr. Mohammed Swazuri as Chairperson of the 6 member Commission have been commissioned for 6 years when Kenyans have reached their limits with Kibaki pretending not to see how Land Grabbers are raping the land and exporting land to China after issueing a blank cheque to the Chinese Commission Agents of the Corporate Special Business Interest. According to Kibaki, like TJRC headed by Kiplagat, Land Commissioners report will be played around and suspended like many others that came before and be heard after the next election of 2018 is over. Who is Kibaki fooling wajamaa??? (kwetu kwaporomoka, kwao wanajenga ma palace)……the irregular allotments and release of Title Deads to fake land owners will continue doing business as usual while the real land owners will remain in the cold. After six more years, the owners of the lands will have died by them, what shall become of the offspring’s of the dead who have no idea of what became of their land, and finding the matter of the land complicated they give up. This is making life extremely difficult for Victims of Land Grabbing; talking of 6 more years??? Ati for 6 more years? Listen people, we are not fools, Kibaki and Uhuru jointly are destroying the rest of Kenya’s community with stupid backwards tactics that must be rejected forthwith and Kibaki with others must join Uhuru and team to the ICC Hague……because, this behavior is inhuman, is criminat and it is against human rights for people to live without dignity with no peace. It is a mean act driven with selfishness; it is sad, illogical and pathetic and this cannot be tolerated. Kibaki with team of thievers must face justice squarely whichever way that is…….

This matter is not simple and we are prepared to fight harder than before as far as going to ICC Court in the Hague we shall go there in order that we resolve this Land Issue in Kenya, Sudan, Uganda, and Congo must be resolved as Land Grabbers consolidated their interest as a combined force; protecting each other to safeguard their vested special interest. We are not going to sit pretty and watch this go on. If it will mean all parties involved in Land dispute and conflict, all businesses dealing in Land shall be forced to stop until the matter of Land is fully settled to the satisfaction of the local community who were defrauded and forced out of their land and became victims of land grabbing theft. We shall not rest until that is finally accomplished.

Public loaned money intended to develop land for Agricultural Community Development with providing for Environmental securities protection did not do what it was intended to do, where did all these money go to??? ……

At some point Budgetary discrepancies in altering and adding figures were identified by the Legislatures and later cold water was poured and the matter turned to be reduced to typing errors. Why did this happen if threats and force did not play a game here. It is believed that public loaned money intended for Community development also disappeared through various corrupt exit routes to profit Special Business Interest and this could not be downplayed as typing error as there are evidently population of victims who suffer painfully from corruption and impunity effects pay high cost in taxes for basic commodity needs in order to make repayment of money stolen from public coufers. It is believed that, some Loans with other project funding earlier disappear through Equity Bank before it recently in 2011 public money begun to be channeled through Cooperative Bank of Kenya and K-Rep. This is still wrong as we have not been told why external funding and loans exchanges and transfers are not being channeled through Central Bank of Kenya for accountability, checks and balances and we are made to wonder when the system changed from Central Bank and why ? Does this explain public business run as private and family affair???

We are also concerned why the Appropriation Bill became very controversial denying the Parliamentarians the voice to Plan properly for the Budget, control of expenditures and make decision except Minister for Finance Ministry awarding himself autonomy of power to privately facilitated, discharge and controlled Public Office clandestinely under the knowledge and express permission of Kibaki. This was evident when control of Privatization Act, Public Procurement Act and Disposal Act, the Energy Act, Price Control on public essential goods, Kenya Information and Communication acts were some of the amendments included in the finance Bill that were not within the Bills mandate but were sneaked in privately (Ki-mpango wa kando) outside the official prerogatives for Reform policy. This is out of order, criminal, unconstitutional and cannot be accepted.

With all these unexplained Public Finance heavy casualties of fiscal debts incurred from taxpayer indebtedness, misappropriation and the embezzlement reports, Uhuru Kenyatta is considered guilty without reasonable doubt that he faulted, committed crime in conflict of interest and by short-changing Constitutional policy to profit self from corruption.

The Supplementary Budget Estimate (Minimum Budget) was approved in December because Uhuru became stubborn and refused Parliament to enact Finance Bill and instead of Shs. 58 billion approved for Country’s Transitional Caretaker costs with the County’s devolution, which the Parliament authorized 15% for the County’s allocation, the Counties allocation faulted with only 6% release which is below the Constitutional threshold. This is a serious offense that has raised eyebrows and there are serious questions demanding where the rest of the money went. Uhuru and Kibaki must answer questions why they are meddling with Public Finances and refused to enact Finance Bill; as a result Fiscal Public Debt has grown to over 50% in GDP expecting public to shoulder expenses in paying overpriced taxes on goods purchases where Special Interest gain in collectibles from high prices on fundamental basic commodity goods including increase of prices on oil that run industries and transportation etc.,

Uhuru Kenyatta in express authority of Finance Ministry set aside Investor Compensation fund from loses by Nyaga Stock Brokers and Discount Securities Ltd when it collapsed with public money. Upon Audit, it was found that Donor fund for KESSP with WKCDD were misappropriated that too was paid by Finance Ministry Public Account without public information or consultation and approval. This character explain that Uhuru Kenyatta does not value or respect Reform Change for National values and Principles of Good Governance.

People, Kibaki and Uhuru must be put to task….. Which is why, Finance Ministry must be fully audited and report made public. Uhuru must face scrutiny and go for a thorough Integrity examination threshold and altogether face legal justice if found guilty. We must not take Kibaki’s meandering for a fool; there is serious conspiracy to frustrate Reform Change Mandate and we must fight to protect our livelihood and survival.

Recently Ferdinand Waititu Nairobi County Governor candidate for TNA faces voters’ wrath in bribe attempt. The team was made up of Waititu, Senate candidate Gideon Mbuvi Sonko and Women Representative Rachel Shebesh were apparently dishing out money with attempt to bribe people. This is voter fraud with an intention to rig elections. This is unacceptable.

We are also concerned that IMF is raising alarm about Kenya’s Huge Public Debt. It was by June last year that Kenya’s Public Debt exploded. Kenya is in for a rude shock and we will have forgotten too quickly who former President Moi was grooming for business as usual project. It is because of Land Grabbing of the unfinished business of Moi that Kibaki carried Uhuru project forward. Don’t be fooled. If former President Moi was fwataring nyayo (foot-steps of Kenyatta) and we saw Land Grabbing skyrocketing going through the roof; it is in the same manner Kibaki stage-managed for Kimemia which is not a secret but has become an open public book that Kimemia was planted to stage-manage rigging of the election. Kimemias silence from responding to IEBC letter will not save his skin from facing justice on conflict of interest. 48 hours deadline expected to end on Saturday are gone and he has not responded. It is therefore worrisome and very scary what Kimemia is capable of doing after watching his aggressive engagement in politics and assertiveness moves of marshalling government system with a purpose of rigging the election brings us back to re-visit memory lane of 2007/8.

This is why Kimemia must step down or be forced to resign immediately…..

It is not by chance that in this era of Reform Change, Chief Justice Willy Mutunga in his jurisdiction of an independent institution, he is still threatened, intimidate and undermined by those equal to his juniors in the Judiciary, where CJ found himself in an awkward situation being forced to cry that his life is in danger. Hey! it is time Kenyans must be very worried that March 4th 2013 after maliciously leaving out the Diaspora from voting for whatever reasons that were presented and following with the instantaneous scare-tactics as recently been witnessed in such careless police shootings and killings with the recent IEBC election computers day light theft coupled with motivated civil conflicts that are spreading out like bush fire, things are definitely not right and elections are bound to be rigged as it is already flawed; reasons why it cannot be simply taken for granted.

What was the reasons why Kibaki avoided signing the Environmental Bill and becoming stubborn to Gazette Land Commissioners? Recently, Kibaki defy Courts’ 7 days rule orders to Gazette Commissioners of Land. Does this explain something??? Well, it makes us theorize that, Land Grabbing in Kenya is under some sort of protectorate for special interest away from public interest, which is why, Uhuru was Moi’s “project” and now Kimemia is crafted by Kibaki to take control of protecting interests of the “project” through smart rigging. True or False…… If this is the plan, it is unacceptable and it is against the Law…….

It brings us to demand for answers why the Chinese under commission agency was given a blank check by Kibaki to export wholesome Kenyas land to China? Whose mandate was this arrangement executed and with which constitutional policy was Land relocation authorized to be shipped to China ? What were the security prospects taken into consideration with regard to advantages against disadvantages. If so, how much was made in tax revenues as per report of accountability and GDP in terms of quantities and quality evaluation of the rated land sale, water with other natural minerals (Gold, Diamond, Taitanium, Coltan, Iron Ore, Zink etc) including the amount and size of the Trade Exports commodity value for sales profitability? Why was the Land export to China not provided in policy legislation? What was the obstacle barrier that hindered Land bill from being enacted in order to conform with Reform Mandate for transparency and accountability ??? How and who will shoulder the heavy burden thereof with costs that shall demands for land repair to replenish environmental destabilization and pollution incurred by the Chinese Agency relocating land to China…..??? How was this quantified and evaluated, incase damage costs supersede profit made from land relocation exported to China if there is no report of the same or checks and balances to ascertain responsibility with integrity???

Finance Ministry being non-compliance to Reform agreement and constantly dodged logistics for justification of the same to facilitate authenticity clarity of Budgeting and Expenditures with those emanating from fiscal debts accruements in order to legitimize Finance Bill for accountability is a crime of purposeful evasion with an agenda to discount Public Mandate Reform Agreement and is against the Constitutional principle.

Intelligently, balancing Trade Policies for progressive Partnership program including the success of Millennium Development Agenda is core value that Politicians must take into serious consideration in their representation from bottom up. This is where local community welfare progressive plan is made to include demands for grassroots’ Peasant farmers in the local communities, the small dukawala with local market hawkers, the middleclass businessmen and women, the individual scholars with professional experts’ interests must have been included to engage in a fair plan and distribution of governance program for development plan and this is a good measure of economic balance for progress. In the event, those candidates eyeing public office if previously had occupied public office, they must prepare to explain what good things they did, organized, planned, engaged or put in place to secure peoples mandated agenda is secured for Reform development progress when they had the opportunity and chance to occupy positions of authority in the legislative policy making and in the Government operations to render public service.

These are credible ways to justify commitment of Public Servants and their responsibility to effectively engage in public service which in effect, secure capacity means to create and boost Government’s public wealth and effectively provide cushioning for economic growth with reliable and sustainable job opportunities expansion. It takes great Humility, Wisdom, Commitment, Responsible demeanor with Integrity to honor human value, virtue and dignity irrespective of Class, Age, Tribal Grouping or Ethnicity when one is in leadership authority. Developing Trust is to honor the Will of the People. This is the core value to Economic stability and success without which, the economy of any Nation is bound to fail and collapse.

How can we trust Uhuru’s Presidency to deliver public mandate if having been earmarked as the “Project of Nyayo” by former president Moi for special business interest we are still not sure of his stand and sincerity to Reform Change Agenda, because Moi fought very hard to be against the Reform and he promised to defeat it? To make matters worse, the two are faced with grave pending cases of human injustices at the ICC Hague. We cannot therefore meddle with situation circumstances fooling ourselves that all is well when we all want to see the end of corruption with impunity, reduce politically engineered fiscal debt, improve social welfare with public health, reduce poverty and environmental pollution situation and altogether face-out historical injustices so that fair justice is truly seen to have been done without compromising public Reform Mandate for good democratic governance with just rule of law.

However difficult Reform struggle may be, people must not accept to be sell-out…..People must stay and remain focused and be sober when it comes to voting politicians as government representatives. We all must join together to condemn ill motives and refrain from adding fuel to corruption with impunity that has over the years, energized corruption in business as usual by allowing ourselves to be used for political selfish greedy gains and more or so, if we are committed to Real Reform Change. People, we definitely want to secure our progressive development agenda that will shape and improve our destiny, leaving this world united under peace caring and sharing in love, which corruption and impunity has robbed from us.

Judy Miriga
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA

http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com

- - - - - - - - - - -

IEBC admits ID card buying going on

Updated Sunday, February 24 2013 at 15:02 GMT+3

By Geoffrey Mosoku

NAIROBI; KENYA: The Independent Electoral and Boundary Commission (IEBC) has launched investigations into reported incidents of Identity Card (ID) buying.

The IEBC says it has information that some people were buying IDs from voters in various parts of the country which it has termed as illegal.

“The Commission is aware of reports that some people are buying IDs from registered voters. Our internal investigations unit is working with police to unearth this syndicate,”IEBC Chief Electoral Officer James Oswago said.

Oswago said buying IDs is not only criminal but unconstitutional as it denies those voters the right to cast their ballot. “It disenfranchises voters by denying them the right to vote as enshrined in the constitution.”

The electoral body CEO said the commission will be issuing a detailed statement on the claims which threaten to undermine a free and fair election.

Already, the Coalition for Reforms and Democracy (CORD) alliance has complained that their rivals were deeply engaged in buying IDs from their supporters in their strongholds across the country.

CORD presidential campaign Chairman Franklin Bett said ID card buying is has been reported in Kitui, Kakamega, Kisii, Nyamira, Mombasa and parts of Nairobi counties.

While demanding for action by the authorities, Bett cautioned voters not to sell their IDs saying doing so was tantamount to mortgaging your future.

“The 500 shillings or so that you get by selling your ID card is less valuable that what you will get by participating in the polls through casting your vote,” he said.

Bett who was accompanied by ODM secretary General Anyang’ Nyong’o, was speaking yesterday at the CORD centre in Nairobi when they launched a campaign dubbed ‘Stand up for Kenya, Get out and vote’.

According to the lobby officials Zuleka Hassan and Arnold Karanja, the team aims to move across the country and especially in their strongholds and swing vote areas.

The team of youthful representatives from ODM, Wiper and Ford Kenya will be holding a door to door campaign as they mobilize their supporters to turn up in large numbers.

“We are telling Kenyans that it’s not enough to a registered voter but one ought to come out and vote. In this way, our candidate will be able to garner majority of votes,” Zuleka said.

Nyong’o lauded the campaign saying it will encourage many Kenyans to turn out adding that citizens should strive to exercise their democratic right through the ballot.

Among the other areas targeted by the group is the vote rich Rift Valley, where Cord is targeting at least 40 percent of the entire vote.

Kimemia still silent on allegations

Updated Sunday, February 24 2013 at 15:41 GMT+3

By Geoffrey Mosoku

NAIROBI; KENYA: Head of Civil Service Francis Kimemia is yet to respond to allegations that he is actively involved in campaigns for Jubilee alliance.

This is in spite that the 48 hours, that the Independent Elections and Boundary Commission ( IEBC), gave him to respond to the allegations leveled against him by the Cord coalition, has since expired.

By Sunday, the IEBC confirmed that they had not received any response from the besieged Kimemia who has been on the limelight in recent days for all the wrong reasons.

“We have not seen his response,” the electoral body CEO Major (Rtd) James Oswago told the Standard on Sunday.

On Thursday 21st February, IEBC wrote to Kimemia informing him of the accusations and asked him to respond within 48 hours. The deadline for reply expired on Saturday.

The IEBC letter which says the claims are ‘very serious’ detailed six incidents in which Kimemia and other public servants allegedly engaged in partisan political activities contrary to section 43(1) of the Elections Act.

“The Commission is in receipt of formal complaints… of your being partisan in execution of your duties,” reads the letter by IEBC chairman Issack Hassan.

Already, the CORD leadership led by Raila Odinga and Kalonzo Musyoka has asked the top civil servant to quit and concentrate in campaigns for having transformed himself into a ‘jubilee activist’.

The two leaders accused Kimemia who is President Mwai Kibaki’s PS of mobilising the provincial administration to campaign for jubilee.

The Civil Service boss has failed to directly respond to the allegations in as many days instead preferring to communicate though government spokesman Muthui Kariuki who has refuted claims of a government plot to rig elections.

He had also earlier issued a memorandum cautioning civil servants that they risk losing their jobs if they are found engaging in political activities.

Last week, Kimemia chaired the National Security Advisory Committee which ironically ordered for a probe into claims that some senior government officials were engaged in partisan politics.

CORD claims Kimemia had a secret late-night meeting on January 27 with Jubilee presidential candidate Uhuru Kenyatta and his running mate William Ruto at an exclusive resort on the shores of Lake Elementaita.

It is not known what the closed-door meeting discussed. The complaint then lists another meeting two days later at Nairobi’s Bomas of Kenya at which Kimemia is accused of telling groups of provincial administrators they would be sacked if Raila became president.

CORD says Kimemia was also involved in two more meetings on February 9 and 10 at which State officers and elders from Central Kenya and the Rift Valley were pressed to campaign for Jubilee.

Permanent Secretaries Mutea Iringo (Internal Security) and Joseph Kinyua (Finance) and Mr Kennedy Kihara, an official at the Office of the President, are also named as having participated in some of the meetings.

The IEBC letter asks Kimemia to respond to claims that on January 27 he met Uhuru and Ruto at a Lake Elementaita hotel from about 10.20pm to 11.15pm.

Two days later, it is alleged, he urged district commissioners, county commissioners and provincial commissioners at a meeting in Nairobi to support Jubilee.

Cord further alleged that on February 9, in the company of Iringo and Kinyua, he met 68 elders from Murang’a, Kiambu, Nakuru, Kericho and Molo at Jacaranda Hotel where support for Uhuru was reportedly discussed.

Guest•3 months ago

This iebec problem seems and sounds like it will mess up the election process.They need to fix the problems now not after the elections.
Magnitude of voter ignorance will take IEBC by surprise during polls

Posted Tuesday, November 27 2012 at 18:51

According to the information available on the Internet from IEBC, the total number of Voter Registration Centres in the country is 24,601.

I want to believe that the same centres will be used as polling stations in the coming General Election.

Correct me if I’m wrong. You will realise that I have not received any civic education on many issues related to voter registration. I want to further believe that there are fewer BVR kits than the centres.

I would like to be educated on how polling will operate. At least for now during voter registration, one kit is used in more than one centre in a number of areas.

Since the polling stations will operate more or less simultaneously during the elections, it will not be practicable to use one machine for more than one station.

When I went to register, I was told that all I will need on polling day will be my physical presence and my ID.

After I had registered, I was not given what other voters before me were given and that is the “IEBC acknowledgement slip”, the reason being they had been exhausted.

The IEBC supervisor said he would try to get them from Nairobi, even as the slip was not really that necessary. He added that I could collect the slip on polling day. What a joke! Why did the IEBC waste public funds to print and provide it in the first place?

But come to think of it, if the IT system misbehaves, I have no evidence to show that I’m a voter. So, I do not want to buy the idea that the slip is not important.

I hope the IEBC will not rely entirely on the IT system to store and do everything. I believe it would be advisable to also have the data in hard-copy just in case something unexpected happens, say, about 10 per cent of the machines fail to work during polling day.

Finally, I am imagining that many voters will not be familiar with the new system. What steps is the IEBC taking to ensure that all Kenyans are familiar with the new system and, that any form of interference regarding those voters who will not be conversant with the system is minimised?

If ever there was time when the IEBC was to be on top of things, this is it. It is very easy to mess things up with the IT system, unless those handling the process are really people of integrity who care about the welfare of Kenya and the people of this nation.

For heaven’s sake, let us all, as a country and people, try to avoid a repeat of the rigging and stealing of elections of the 2007. God bless the IEBC! God bless Kenya and the people of this great nation!

BERNARD KITUR, Nairobi

**********

Create awareness

Failure by the IEBC to meet its weekly target of 3.7 million is cause for alarm. The result is a clear indication that Kenyans, besides other hindrances like lack of ID cards and insecurity, are deficient of voter education.

The IEBC and other organisations have scored poorly in educating the masses on the need to enlist afresh.

Politicians, especially sitting MPs and councillors who have lost touch with the voters and thus on their way out, cannot be expected to spearhead such a campaign as some even wish that no one registers to send them home.

In my interactions with the public, I have realised that they are yet to know that everybody aged 18 and above and with an ID card or passport is being registered afresh.

Some are still keeping their old voters’ cards thinking that the ongoing registration exercise is only for those who had lost them or had never been listed as voters.

Other Kenyans are being turned away because they have the old generation ID cards and have decided to keep off instead of going to apply for the new generation IDs (Immigration ministry promised to have 60,000 churned out weekly).

There is also the feeling that people should even be bribed to register. Some have been asking questions such as “Why register?” “Why vote?”.

They have lost hope in the people they voted for in the past to the extent that they see no need to vote any more.

DENNIS BIKO, Kakamega

**********

Potent weapon

Some think that voting is time-wasting and of no impact. How do you expect things to change yet you shy away from a process that will shape the destiny of Kenya?

The vote is our potent weapon to spur a revolution. It is a golden opportunity to elect leaders who will steer our nation forward.

ALEX KIMONDO, Nyeri

Kimemia, remember those who came before you

Updated Friday, February 22 2013 at 00:00 GMT+3

One day I was alone with a furious minister in his office. The minister was fuming that in our constituency profiles, we had shown his curriculum vitae as being the shortest, almost with nothing to talk about really.

As he foamed in the mouth, something that made me unhappy with my boss for sending me to go ‘get his side of the story’, he kept pointing at President Moi’s portrait, on the wall. “What are you telling him... that he picks illiterates to run ministries? Are you trying to have me sacked? I will deal with you, you will regret this young man!’’ thundered the livid minister.

The chap just like myself then, switched into our mother tongue in response to my statement that I had nothing to do with the profile.

“I don’t care, when men fight with sticks, and when one breaks, the splinter hits the nearest person. For me that is you!’’

The message sunk that the chap was actually telling me that I must somehow have been within the vicinity of a crime scene. I was among the undergrowth upon which a huge tree crashes on when it falls.

I thought about the former influential minister who did not in the end give me his CV, when I listened to Chief Justice Willy Mutunga, talk about a man who almost went for the Governor race, were it not for the tribulations of his former boss Mr Francis Muthaura.

He is called Francis Kimemia, a guy who I am told has the ear of retiring President Kibaki.

Let us just ask ourselves why his name these days keeps popping up in the most unlikely of places.

The claim by Chief Justice Mutunga that Kimemia tried to lord over the Judiciary by purporting to have him stopped from going outside the country without his clearance, is just one among the many that have been coming up.

You have heard about how he one time reportedly sneaked some names to Parliament for clearance, purporting to have been agreed to both by the President and Prime Minister.

You also heard about him and the 47 County Commissioners the court ruled were appointed by the President — to whom he reports directly and some of whose key decisions he implements — unconstitutional.

Months later, they are still in their stations and the coded message to the courts is that the Judges and Magistrates can jump into Lake Victoria, but things will be done the way the Harambee House mandarins want, led by Kimemia, and not as ought to be according to the law.

Lest you forgot, Kimemia actually, like Muthaura was, and is the ‘engine’ of the Presidency.

25Feb/130

Africa: THREE YEARS DOWN THE LINE SINCE THE LUSAKA DECLARATION OF THE ICGLR SPECIAL SUMMIT ON THE FLIGHT OF ILLEGAL EXPLOITATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE GREAT LAKES REGION HAS YET TO BE IMPLEMENTED.

News Analysis By Leo Odera Omolo

The Great Lakes Region is one of Africa’s richest region in terms of natural and human resources. However, it remains largely impoverished and its political, social and economic development has been hindered by conflict and absence of the rule of law.

It was in response to the regional conflicts that countries in the region, under the auspices of the United Nations and then Organization of African Unity decided to form the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region {ICGLR} .

Last week, the regional leaders signed a deal aimed at bringing peace and stability to the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo with plans to reinforce a UN-led mission to combat rebels activities in the region after years of unrest.

Eleven countries in the Great Lakes region - including rebel groups - signed on to the accord at a ceremony in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa in the presence of the UN Secretary General Psan Ki-Moon

The entire region is hoping that this time the accord such an accord will hold its waters, after many similar agreement brokered before collapsed even before the ink dried up. D. R. Congo has remained unstable nation in Africa ever since it attained its political independence from its former colonial masters the Belgium in June 1960.

On December 15th, 2010, Heads of State and governments of Member States of the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region {ICGLR} gather in the Zambian capital, Lusaka

The summit passed far-reaching 19 resolutions dabbed The Lusaka Declaration. However, these resolutions which formed the part of the Lusaka Declaration have remained ineffective and no signs of implementation Ha been put to practical work.

LEO OIDERA OMOLO, A veteran Kenyan journalist who attended the Lusaka summit in this two parts analytical article is examining what has since become of the Lusaka Declaration.

The main theme at the Lusaka Summit was “The Problem of illegal |Exploitation of the region’s natural resources.”

The problem of illegal exploitation of natural resources spans the mining sector and trade in valuable minerals of the region which perniciously deprives the region of vital resources of revenue so much required by social and economic development. These resources can create greater prosperity for the member countries, but ii used poorly, the wealth will cause economic instability, conflict and environmental degradation.

It was with these special challenges sand special opportunities in the mind of the leaders of the Great Lakes Region that they resolved at the Lusaka Summit to mobilize existing technical expertise, human resources and their political goodwill under the auspices of the ICGLR to fight against illegal exploitation of natural resources being one of the ways of transforming the region into a space of peace and stability and socio-economic development.

In attendance at the Lusaka Summit were President Jose Eduardo Dos Santos {Angola} Denis Sassou Nguesso {he Republic of Congo Brazzaville}.Pierre Nkrunzinza{Burundi}.Joseph Kabila Kabange {DR Congo} Jakaya Mrisho Kikweteb {anzania}, Rupiah B Banda {Zambia} oweri Kaguta Museveni {Uganda}, (mar Hassan Ahmed Bashir {Sudan} Mwai Kibaki {Kenya}, Francois Bozize {Central African Republic}.

The 19 resolutions were as follows: We, Heads of State and Member States of the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region [ICGLR} who gathered in Lusaka, are concerned about the persistent illegal exploitation of natural resources in the Great Lakes Region and its linkage to the proliferation of small arms and light weapons, financing of armed groups and perpetuation of crimes against humanity.

We, are aware of the need to streamline the activities of local, regional and multinational actors involved in the exploitation of natural resources.

We, are cognizant of the commitment, mutual trust and cooperation in the implementation of the Pact on Security, stability and development of the Great Lakes Region.

We are, recalling the decision of the Mini-Summit held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on 1 February 2010, in which the ICGLR Secretariat and the Democratic of the Congo [DRC}government are urged to organize a Special Summit to address the issues related to illegal exploitation of natural resources in the Great Lakes Region;

We, are deeply concerned about the negative impact of the illegal exploitation of natural resources which deprives states of resources needed to fight poverty and aggravates environmental degradation.

We are fully aware of the economic conflicts and persistent insecurity caused by armed groups and the Great Lakes Region financed through the illegal exploitation of natural resources and trade in minerals, in particular gold, Colombo-Tentalite, Woliranite and Cassiterite and concerned about the negative impact these armed groups have had on the population in the region including crimes against humanity, and massive violation of human rights such as sexual and gender based violence.

Please watch for the second instalment.

ends

25Feb/130

Kenya: The die is cast; We must make it in Round 1

From: odhiambo okecth

Dear Friends,

We are on the home stretch and come Monday the 4th March 2013, the 14.3m registered voters in Kenya will be invited to step forward and help make a clear choice. As we do this, we must know that our votes comes with clear consequences and for those who have not yet made up their minds, tonight's Presidential Debate may help.

[ . . . ]

Read full message, see images

25Feb/133

Kenya: “Support for a Raila Odinga Presidency” — CORD Alliance

From: Kenya Diaspora CORD Alliance

Dear friend,

Maybe you are disillusioned by the abrasive politicking and the many requests you've received soliciting your support. However, with only a week to election day, you cannot stand on the sidelines. You can still influence the future of Kenya.

A CORD Alliance government promises to work diligently to make our country peaceful, secure, and prosperous, and respected. We must elect a leadership that is truly dedicated to reforms.

You only have one week to get the CORD Alliance accross the finish line. The time to act is now, not tomorrow !

Click here to learn more about why you should support a Raila Odinga Presidency
http://t.ymlp256.net/uuyavawqqwaxambaxamem/click.php

Remember to encourage your friends and families to commit to peace before and after the elections. Just forward this email to your personal or organizational database. The future of Kenya depends on it.

Thank you.

Spalatin Oire
Kenya Diaspora Cord Alliance