From: People For Peace
Date: Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:12 AM
Subject: Regional News

Colleagues Home & Abroad Regional News 

 

 

UNDERSTANDING FAITH TODAY

 

BY FR JOACHIM OMOLO OUKO, AJ

NAIROBI-KENYA

SATURDAY, MAY 19, 2012

 

With the Apostolic Letter of 11 October 2011, Porta fidei, Pope Benedict XVI declared a Year of Faith to begin on 11 October 2012 with the 50thanniversary of the opening of the Second Ecumenical Vatican Council called by Blessed Pope John XXIII in October 11, 1962. It will conclude on 24 November 2013, the Solemnity of our Lord Jesus Christ, Universal King.

 

 

Inset-from left to right-Pope John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I and current Pope-Benedict XVI. He says condoms were not “a real or moral solution,” in some cases they might be used as “a first step in the direction of a moralization, a first assumption of responsibility.” He cited as an example a male prostitute who might use a condom so as not to spread disease/ File

 

While the Pope announced the year to help Catholics appreciate the gift of faith, deepen their relationship with God and strengthen their commitment to sharing faith with others in accordance with the spirit of the Second Vatican Council, the challenge however, is whether our Catholic faith corresponds to the needs of our time as Pope John XXIII wished it.

 

Today, the world seems to be changing quickly and spinning out of control with recent developments in science and culture calling almost everything into question that we once believed. Scientists today appear to debate almost everything of cultural significance, from whether the unborn are persons from conception to whether miracles are possible.

 

The greatest challenge facing Christians today is not finding answers to specific questions or solutions to specific problems, but making clear to our culture that the Christian faith is relevant to all questions and all problems.

 

According to Pope John XXIII, the most popular of modern times-and perhaps ever, the church must move within the signs of time. Although he did not categorically condemn the contraceptives, some liberal theologians maintain that had he lived today, no doubt he would allow condoms to be used as means to save life from people with HIV/Aids.

 

He wanted the Church that could bring Christ to the world. Christ who came to save life and not destroy it. Pope John XXIII even after his death he is enormously popular and widely admired as a man of goodwill, holiness and vision.

 

There is a say that good people do not last longer. At the death of Pius XII he was elected Pope on 28 October 1958, taking the name John XXIII. Although his pontificate lasted less than five years, this presented him to the entire world as an authentic image of the Good Shepherd- meek and gentle, enterprising and courageous, simple and active.

 

He carried out the Christian duties of the corporal and spiritual works of mercy: visiting the imprisoned and the sick, welcoming those of every nation and faith, bestowing on all his exquisite fatherly care. His social magisterium in the Encyclicals Pacem in terris and Mater et Magistra was deeply appreciated.

 

He convoked the Roman Synod, established the Commission for the Revision of the Code of Canon Law and summoned the Second Vatican Council. The faithful saw in him a reflection of the goodness of God and called him "the good Pope". He was sustained by a profound spirit of prayer. He died on the evening of 3 June 1963, in a spirit of profound trust in Jesus and of longing for his embrace.

 

Pope John XXIII in the encyclical emphasized the need to speak of man's rights. Man has the right to live. He has the right to bodily integrity and to the means necessary for the proper development of life, particularly food, clothing, shelter, medical care, rest, and, finally, the necessary social services.

 

In consequence, he has the right to be looked after in the event of illhealth; disability stemming from his work; widowhood; old age; enforced unemployment; or whenever through no fault of his own he is deprived of the means of livelihood.

 

On Rights Pertaining to Moral and Cultural Values he emphasized that man has a natural right to be respected. He has a right to his good name. He has a right to freedom in investigating the truth, and—within the limits of the moral order and the common good—to freedom of speech and publication, and to freedom to pursue whatever profession he may choose. He has the right, also, to be accurately informed about public events.

 

Also among man's rights is that of being able to worship God in accordance with the right dictates of his own conscience, and to profess his religion both in private and in public. Human beings have also the right to choose for themselves the kind of life which appeals to them: whether it is to found a family—in the founding of which both the man and the woman enjoy equal rights and duties—or to embrace the priesthood or the religious life.

 

Men are by nature social, and consequently they have the right to meet together and to form associations with their fellows. They have the right to confer on such associations the type of organization which they consider best calculated to achieve their objectives. They must live together and consult each other's interests.

 

Man's personal dignity he says requires besides that he enjoy freedom and be able to make up his own mind when he acts. In his association with his fellows, therefore, there is every reason why his recognition of rights, observance of duties, and many-sided collaboration with other men, should be primarily a matter of his own personal decision.

 

Each man should act on his own initiative, conviction, and sense of responsibility, not under the constant pressure of external coercion.

 

Like Pope John XXIII, Pope John Paul I had dreamed of a Roman Catholic Church that would truly respond to the needs of its people on vital issues such as artificial birth control.

 

He dreamed of a Church that would dispense with the wealth, power and prestige it had acquired through Vatican Incorporated; of a church that would get out of the marketplace, where the message of Christ had become tainted; of a Church that would once again rely on what has always been its greatest asset, its source of true power, its greatest claim to a unique prestige: the Gospel.

 

One of Pope John Paul I’s dreams was to clean up the Vatican Bank which was later riddled in 1982 with scandals revealing the Vatican hierarchy's filthy connection with Freemasonry, the Mafia, the CIA and its real purpose of bringing financial destruction while advocating wars and genocide worldwide.


According to David Yallop in his Book: “ In God’s Name” he was killed on the 33rd day of his papacy, the number 33 being an occult symbol that good will never defeat evil and the disguise and duplicity of the Vatican will never be uncovered.

He was the first pope to choose a double name and did so to honor his two immediate predecessors, Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI. He was also the first (and so far only) pope to use "the first" in his regal name.

 

Like Pope John XXIII, Pope John Paul I never lived longer. But even those who do not die sooner, their efforts to bring the church within the signs of time are frustrated. Renowned Catholic theologian, Fr Charles Curran is one of such.

 

He was removed from the faculty of the Catholic University of America by the Vatican in 1986 for reaffirming the need for a ban on artificial contraception and questioning the Catholic Church's authority on teaching moral issues, including premarital sex, abortion and homosexuality.

 

He challenged Pope Paul VI’s encyclical Humanae Vitae, published in 1968, and largely rejected by lay Catholics and clergy around the world. In his book:  'Loyal Dissent', he says you can be a faithful Catholic but disagree with the pope. He concurred with his fellow theologian, Hans Kung who refutes the idea that Pope is infallible.

 

Their arguments concur with philosopher Kierkegaard who argues that Christian faith is not a matter of regurgitating church dogma. It is a matter of individual subjective passion, which cannot be mediated by the clergy or by human artefacts.

 

The carton depicts Kierkegaard’s theory of leap of faith- faith based on fear and doubts-because you are not sure whether what you believe in represents the will of God. In its most commonly used meaning, a leap of faith is the act of believing in or accepting something intangible or un-provable, or without empirical evidence.

 

The choice of faith he says is not made once and for all. It is essential that faith be constantly renewed by means of repeated avowals of faith. Christian dogma, according to Kierkegaard, embodies paradoxes which are offensive to reason.

 

In other words, faith must change with time. That is why, even though the Vatican has insisted it won’t change its stand on contraceptives even those dying from HIV/Aids, some high ranking authorities of the Roman Catholic Church argue that in the case of HIV/Aids Vatican must change its stand.

 

In May 2011, Monsignor Kevin Dowling, bishop of Rustenburg, South Africa, said in an e-mail that condoms are in line with Catholic teachings “in certain circumstances, [when] the use of a condom is allowable not as a contraceptive but to prevent disease.”

 

He said of the HIV ministry program he administers, “We do not give out condoms, but people are fully informed about prevention methods and helped to make informed decisions about how they can protect themselves and, if they themselves are HIV positive, how they can avoid infecting someone else.”

 

In December 2010, Archbishop Bernard Longley, archbishop of Birmingham, said that Pope Benedict XVI’s provisional support of condoms was “recognizing that within any individual's life there is always the possibility of stepping from one position to a position that is closer to truth and goodness.

 

That is how I read and understood what he was saying about the use of a condom in those particular circumstances that he outlined and that one could see how conscience works within an individual” (The Tablet, “Treading a fine line,” December 10, 2010).

 

In response to Pope Benedict’s statement condemning the use of condoms to prevent the transmission of HIV, Bishop Clemente of Portugal denounced the pope’s remarks stating that in the case of HIV, condoms are “not only recommended, they can be ethically obligatory,”  Associated Press, March 29, 2009.

 

Bishop Dowling, in an interview about HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment in South Africa said, "Abstinence before marriage and faithfulness in a marriage is beyond the realm of possibility here. 

 

The issue is to protect life. That must be our fundamental goal."  Drawing attention to the especially difficult plight of women in the traditionally male-dominated societies of his diocese he continued, "My passion is for the women.  I'm in that corner." About the African people, he says, "They must use condoms," maintaining his stance despite the Vatican’s continued opposition to such a policy”, Grand Rapid Press (Michigan), April 15, 2007.

 

Mombasa Archbishop Boniface Lele, Kenya said, “With some counseling—and this is something we don’t tell everyone—you can ask couples to use condoms, so that the rate of re-infection goes down,” Kenya London News, August 25, 2006.

 

In an interview with Deutsche Presse-Agentur, the archbishop of Douala, Cardinal Christian Wiyghan Tumi, defended the decision to use condoms to prevent the transmission of HIV/AIDS between married couples, saying, “If a partner in a marriage is infected with HIV, the use of condoms makes sense,” The Tablet, May 11, 2006.

 

In an interview with a Scottish newspaper, Mario Conti, the Archbishop of Glasgow, pledges his support for the Pontifical Council for Health Care Workers' recent decision to conduct and release a study on condom use to fight AIDS and contends that using condoms to stop transmission of the disease from one spouse to another is "common sense," The Scotsman, May 5, 2006.

 

South African Bishop Kevin Dowling addresses a forum sponsored by Physicians for Human Rights about the use of condoms in preventing the spread of AIDS. While he reiterates the important place that fidelity and abstinence before marriage can have in stopping the deadly virus, he maintains that this approach alone is not a pragmatic solution based in the realities of people's lives around the world. He insists, "Abstinence is fine as an ideal, but it does not work in all circumstances (Washington Post, April 26)

 

Condoms are worn during intercourse to prevent pregnancy and the spread of some sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), such as HIV, gonorrhea, and chlamydia. Although Benedict said condoms were not “a real or moral solution,” in some cases, they might be used as “a first step in the direction of a moralization, a first assumption of responsibility,” citing as an example a male prostitute who might use a condom so as not to spread disease, the statement appeared to be a sign of the lingering confusion when the Vatican said later Pope was misquoted.

 

In a book published 2010, Benedict XVI-Light of the World-Conversation with Peter Seewald, the Vatican said that Benedict’s comments had been misinterpreted and manipulated by those who effectively saw them as permission for more widespread use of condoms, which like all birth control, goes against church teaching. Some conservative Catholics, especially in the United States, feared that it would be misinterpreted as a move to condone condom use.

 

 

 

Inset- a buddhist monk at Wat Prabat Namphu Temple taking care of the HIV/Aids victim. UNAIDS (2007), estimates that about 22 million in sub-Saharan Africa are infected with HIV. This makes up 67 percent of the world's HIV-positive people. Of recorded AIDS-related deaths in 2007, three-quarters occurred in sub-Saharan Africa. HIV and Aids have also been a serious problem in Thailand. The problem has been largely ignored but some social activists, like the one running this hospice, have made great strides forward in bringing the problem to light and helping those who need it/ File

 

 

In the book’s German and English editions, the text cites the example of a male prostitute, implying homosexual sex, in which a condom would not be a form of contraception.

 

Although the Italian edition uses the feminine form of prostitute, Father Federico Lombardi, the Director of the Vatican Press Office said that the Italian translation was an error, but added that the pope had specifically told him that the issue was not procreation but rather disease prevention — regardless of gender.

 

Peter Seewald is a veteran German journalist who has done two other internationally best-selling book length interviews with Joseph Ratzinger (now Benedict XVI): Salt of the Earth and God and the World.  He is also the author of Benedict XVI: An Intimate Portrait, and the photo-biography, Pope Benedict XVI: Servant of the Truth.

 

Kenya Episcopal Conference (KEC) while reacting on Pope’s statement blamed media for misrepresenting the remarks of Pope Benedict XVI on the issue of sexual morality and the struggle against the HIV and AIDS infection.

 

The bishops in their statement reaffirmed that the position of the Catholic Church as regards the use of condoms, both as a means of contraception and as a means of addressing the grave issue of HIV/AIDS infection has not changed and remains as always unacceptable.

 

They said the media reports had unfairly quoted the Pope out of context and banalized the deeply sensitive medical, moral and pastoral issues of HIV/AIDS and accompaniment of those infected or affected, reducing the discussion on the demands of sexual morality to a mere comment on condoms.

 

The book in question “Light of the World: the Pope, the Church and the Signs of Times- A conversion of Pope Benedict XVI with Peter Seewald” the bishops said in a statement was the result of an interview and was not written by the Pope.

 

People for Peace in Africa (PPA)
P O Box 14877
Nairobi
00800
, Westlands
Kenya

Tel +254-7350-14559/+254-722-623-578

E-mail- ppa@africaonline.co.ke

omolo.ouko@gmail.com

Website: www.peopleforpeaceafrica.org