Any time there is any kind of election, the question of experience emerges.I recently listened to a very hot and charged discussion by the political pundits on whether or not Obama has what it takes to be the president.
This reminds me of comments made by some pastors from Andrews that we had at our church this last Saturday. They noted that back home during camp meetings the conference would send unmarried people to go and speak on the subject of marriage. One pastor made us laugh to tears when he observed that he always gave them something else.
I am sure that you know of places that you will not be hired unless you have experience. May be you have been a victim at one time or the other.
Which leads me to this question. Is experience necessary? What will you advise on the following:
1. Would you rather chose as the president a personwith experience or give someone else a chance?
2. If your church wanted to do a seminar on family life, whom would your choice be?
3. If you fell ill and went to the hospital where there is a new Doctor and one with experience whom will you chose?
Where can one draw the line?
Just wondering.
Blessings.
Pr Birai-612-386-4608
www.themaranathasdachurch.org
true leaders are anointed by God , u dont need experience for that. most of what true leaders do is to lead by wisdom and not mostly practicaly,and this also comes from God. as a man of God you should less wonder why Obama is in the picture ,ask the Clintons, they are honored to meet this Ruoth
If every nation is to elect a president because of experience then the first president will preside till death. Give me a break!! A person with ability to lead should be given chance to lead and bring the new ideas that they have. God has placed in some people the ability to lead.