from Judy Miriga

Folks,

Just to add a little ……for the sake of Peace, Love and Unity, Gaddaffi Must Go….. He is the root cause problem of Kenya, East Africa and Africa as a whole…..Without Gaddaffi, Museveni would not have stolen Migingo and Ugingo for Somali and Al-Qaeda, Mungiki, with Al-Shabaab invasion as well as Kamlesh Patni brain-work for money would not be a headache, ……Without Gaddaffi Pirating and Somali terrorism with Militiamen recruits in Africa will slow down……Museveni of Uganda would not be an issue……..Get In The Know People……!

Gaddaffi is trouble, and trouble must trouble him to ICC Hague for Africa and the world to be at peace in a sober environment…..thats why China want to put up a nuclea plant in Kenya and East Africa…….Crazy….!

Without Gaddaffi, China would not be such a problem in Kenya and in Africa as it is……..wake up and connect the dots people ……….!!!.

Judy Miriga
Diaspora Spokesperson
Executive Director
Confederation Council Foundation for Africa Inc.,
USA
http://socioeconomicforum50.blogspot.com

– – – – – – – – – – –

Frederick Ngure wrote:

Hi Joe,

This article has a lot of important aspects, particularly where Europe seems to be gearing to recolonize Africa and other Third World countries. However, Qaddafi is kind of cooking himself with his own oil. As a dictator of 40 years plus, he really needs to go. He cannot be bigger than the country he wishes to protect. If he has wanted to leave Libya in good standing, he should promote democracy. When the west focused on Saddam, Qaddafi knew he was the next, hence, his getting rid of weapons was to forestall any attack to remove him from power. On top of being a dictator, he got involved in promoting terrorism. The latest blunder is calling for Nigeria to be split into two, a northern Islamic State and a southern Christian state. I do not think the Nigerians are too sympathetic to him at this moment. Religious problems such as those that plague Nigeria and promoted by people like Qaddafi who has a bigger agenda of growing and creating Islamic states. Personally, I cannot cry for Qaddafi, he needs to go. I would rather cry for Libya and Libyans to be left free after all this scuffle. If Qaddafi loves his country and the greater vision for Africa, he needs to step down, allow for free and fair elections to take place in his country. He can thereafter sit in the background and be an adviser.

Yes, there is a lot of unfairness in the world, but we need to be smart. When Post Election Violence erupted in Kenya, despite where it came from, Kenyans had to seek for a solution. Had peace not arrived early enough, probably US and Britain would have stepped in to resolve our internal problems. Guess what, we could have witnessed in Kenya what is happening in Libya. So, what is wrong with Qaddafi. Can he replay the Kenyan situation and he has all the answers he needs to make an informed decision. At the end of the day, he will be gone. He can leave the smart way or the stupid way, or even more stupid like Saddam and have a noose around his neck.

Thanks

Kubai

From: maurice oduor

If the alternative to NATO bombing of Libya is senseless slaughter of civilians by Gaddafi forces then I’m sorry the bombing is a lesser evil. Should we then have indepence in the likes of Sudan, Zimbambwe, Ethiopia and Chad? I’m sorry but I would rather have them bombed by NATO.

Courage,
Oduor Maurice

From: Joe Kihara Munugu

NATO’s War of Aggression Against Africa
By Obi Nwakanma : BSN : June 5, 2011

———————
The use of Western troops in Africa – particularly in the case of France – the use of its paratroopers, first in Ivory Coast, and now in Libya, represents a new strategic declaration of war against Africa, the African interest, and the African continent. In NATO’s disregard of AU, there is without doubt a re-manifestation of that ontological disease of the Western mind that regards Africa as simply a place without history and without agency. France and Great Britain, leading a NATO alliance, are effectively at war in Libya on the pretext of a United Nations’ mandate. The United States, led the early charge against Libya’s Moumar Ghadaffi from the air, but has taken something of a back seat, and allowed Britain and France to continue what can now be considered a war of aggression against a sovereign African state, far beyond the mandate of the UN.

They have been bombing Libya relentlessly from the air. They have killed Ghadaffi’s son in a direct personal attack on the home of the Ghadaffis. The relentless strafing of Tripoli, the Libyan capital, in the past two weeks has also led to serious civilian casualties which the Libyan authorities have reported and which NATO has denied.

The NATO alliance at the fore of this new colonial war in Africa has now moved beyond its mandate to seek regime change; to undermine the sovereignty of Libya, and create a civil war situation in this North African country and member-nation of the African Union.

The French have positioned their aggression against Libya as a fight to free Libyans from the tyranny of Moumar Ghadaffi. They have not hidden the fact that they wished to make it impossible for a transition of power from Ghadaffi to a newer generation of Libyan nationalists who may follow in the state policies of Ghadaffi, particularly as it affects oil.

It is not a secret that Libya sits on the vastest oil field in Africa and that Ghadaffi has prevented the international oil cartel from exploiting Libya’s oil and had forced them to comply with the strictest standards in oil production.

It is no longer a secret that behind this NATO alliance war on Libya, and far beyond the “do-good” face it places or wears as its mask as its reason for bombing Libya to smithereens, is the quest to control the oil fields of Libya, guarantee Western access to energy sources in the face of growing concern over the rise of China and India and their own emergent gluttony for oil, and, of course, solve the problem of an intransigent African nationalist challenge to Western shenanigans.

It is the 19th century all over again.

Libya is the first flashpoint in the resource war that is bound to once more make Africa the battlefield of the great industrial powers. Once they take out Ghadaffi, that challenge to organise and fund a formidable African resistance against a new colonial mandate using the UN will weaken.

The new scramble for Africa will more than likely commence. It is, therefore, ridiculous that Nigeria, a more than likely victim of this potential threat sits idly, voting with those who have launched a new aggressive war on Libya. The Nigerian government under President Goodluck Jonathan has failed to understand the wider dimensions of this NATO campaign on Libya.